9 sports books for spring

Here are excerpts from seven new books about sports.

9. ‘The Language of the Game: How to Understand Soccer’

Don’t be misled by the title. “The Language of the Game: How to Understand Soccer” may sound like a collection of soccer terminology for the novice fan. It is actually more of an impassioned fan’s perceptive observations about the sport’s history, tactics, and drama. The guide in this journey is a professor of romance studies and history at Duke University who teaches a popular soccer politics course. In the book’s introduction, Laurent Dubois sets the stage by writing, “Given that it is probably the most widely shared form of culture on the planet, soccer must have something to teach us about being human.” In “The Language of the Game,” he avails himself admirably of this teaching moment.  

Here’s an excerpt from The Language of the Game:

“Police and soccer authorities have long struggled with how to stamp out … fan violence. One technique they have used is to punish the teams for the behavior of their fans, notably by forcing them to play in empty stadiums. Eliminating the crowd can clearly resolve the security problems – no fans, no violence – but it also destroys the very spirit of the game. After all, what is a team playing for if not for the fans?

"Struggling with how to respond, the Turkish soccer authorities came up with a novel idea. Instead of banning all the fans from the stadium, why not just exclude the problem demographic: men? [Team] Fenerbahce would be allowed to play in front of their fans, so long as those fans included only women and young children. 

“It worked. Forty thousand women, along with a small number of children, attended the match. The only men in the packed stadium were the players and staff from the two teams, along with referees. Even the security forces in the stands and around the field that day were all women. As the game unfolded, there were some differences: the opposing team was greeted with applause, not boos, for instance, and the players threw flowers up toward the fans. Otherwise, everything was the same.”

9 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.