J.K. Rowling: More of her thoughts on the Harry Potter romance controversy

Harry Potter fans were incensed when J.K. Rowling said – in excerpts released from an interview –  that she'd had misgivings about Hermione and Ron as a couple. The full text of the interview offers more clarity, along with Rowling's feeling about a controversial scene from the movie series.

|
Jaap Buitendijk/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
The 'Harry Potter' film series stars Emma Watson (l.), Rupert Grint (center), and Daniel Radcliffe (r.).

The interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by “Harry Potter” actress Emma Watson for Wonderland Magazine has now been released in full and the text may offer some solace for those Harry Potter fans who weren’t pleased by Rowling’s comments that she’d wondered whether characters Ron and Hermione would have been happy together romantically.

Some fans immediately cried foul when an excerpt was made public in the Sunday Times in which Rowling told Watson, “I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment. That’s how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron.”

Watson agreed, saying, “I think there are fans out there who know that too and who wonder whether Ron would have really been able to make her happy.”

In the full interview for Wonderland Magazine, which Watson guest-edited, Rowling discussed her misgivings about the relationship further.

I think the attraction itself is plausible but the combative side of it.... I'm not sure you could have got over that in an adult relationship, there was too much fundamental incompatibility,” she said.

However, fans of the romantic pairing can hold on to some hope. In the Sunday Times teaser, it merely stated that Rowling thinks the two would have gone to marriage counseling. However, after stating that "maybe she and Ron will be all right with a bit of counseling" (and musing, “I wonder what happens at wizard marriage counseling?”), the author said, “They'll probably be fine. He needs to work on his self-esteem issues and she needs to work on being a little less critical.”

In addition to Rowling’s previously published remark that she thinks Harry and Hermione might have been better together, the author discussed her feelings about a scene in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part One” in which Harry and Hermione dance together in a tent while on the run from villain Voldemort’s forces. Some fans liked the scene; others disagreed with what they saw as subtext of feelings between the two.

However, Rowling said she was surprised by the scene (which is original to the movie) because she’d also thought there might have been attraction between the two in the time when Ron was gone.

“When I wrote Hallows, I felt this quite strongly when I had Hermione and Harry together in the tent!” she told Watson. “I hadn't told [Steve] Kloves that and when he wrote the script he felt exactly the same thing at exactly the same point.”

Watson then tells Rowling that she expressed concern to director David Heyman at the time that the scene strayed too far from Rowling’s original intent.

“I liked that scene in the film, because it was articulating something I hadn't said but I had felt,” Rowling said. “I think you do feel the ghost of what could have been in that scene.”

Check out the full interview here.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to J.K. Rowling: More of her thoughts on the Harry Potter romance controversy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0211/J.K.-Rowling-More-of-her-thoughts-on-the-Harry-Potter-romance-controversy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe