Study: Those who use an e-reader are worse at remembering a plot

|
Brian Snyder/Reuters
A commuter uses his e-reader in Cambridge, Mass.

Does someone who read a novel on paper remember more about the story than a person who used an e-reader to peruse the same text?

Yes, according to a new study. The Guardian reports that lead researcher Anne Mangen of Stavanger University in Norway said at a recent conference in Italy that she and those she worked with presented 50 people with a short story by writer Elizabeth George. Of those 50 readers, 25 received a paper copy and 25 used a Kindle e-reader and then all were then asked questions about the story’s setting, characters, and other details. 

“The Kindle readers performed significantly worse on the plot reconstruction measure, i.e. when they were asked to place 14 events in the correct order,” Mangen said, according to the Guardian. 

Why would Kindle readers be worse at putting steps of the story in order? Mangen suggested that it’s the process of reading a physical book. “When you read on paper you can sense with your fingers a pile of pages on the left growing, and shrinking on the right," she said. "You have the tactile sense of progress, in addition to the visual…. Perhaps this somehow aids the reader, providing more fixity and solidity to the reader's sense of unfolding and progress of the text." 

Mangen says this isn’t the first time she’s seen this happen – last year, she and other researchers had some Norwegian high school students read paper texts and others read the section via a PDF file. “Students who read texts in print scored significantly better on the reading comprehension test than students who read the texts digitally,” she said. 

Not all researchers agree with Mangen, however, and questions about retention and comprehension among e-book readers remain a source of ongoing debate. Last year an article in Scientific American suggested that although initially reading on screens may diminish readers' capacity to understand what they read, that could change over time as readers become more accustomed to reading on screen.

How’s your recall when you read something via your e-reader? Do you think you’d score better on putting a plot in order?

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
QR Code to Study: Those who use an e-reader are worse at remembering a plot
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0820/Study-Those-who-use-an-e-reader-are-worse-at-remembering-a-plot
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us