Forbes billionaires list: Meet the nine richest self-made women

Forbes has released its 2013 Billionaires List, and nestled among the usual Warren Buffetts, Carlos Slims, and wealthy heirs were women who have made or helped make their own fortunes, in industries ranging from television to real estate to clothing. Here are the nine richest self-made women on Forbes’s 2013 Billioniares List. Can you guess who grabbed the top spot?

9. Oprah Winfrey

Andrew Kelly/Reuters/File
Oprah Winfrey attends HBO's New York premiere of the documentary "Beyonce - Life is But a Dream" in New York last month. With a net worth of $2.8 billion, Ms. Winfrey is the only African-American billionaire in the US and one of the richest self-made woman on the Forbes 2013 Billionaires List.

Net worth: $2.8 Billion

Country: United States

Source of wealth: Television – Harpo Productions

Overall Forbes rank: Tied for #503

Oprah has her own eponymous magazine and a fledgling cable network, OWN, which looks to be gaining steam after a rocky start. (Thanks to a deal with Comcast, OWN is available to 83 million households.) But the majority of her wealth comes from her long-running daytime talk show, which ended in 2011, and production company, Harpo, a major player in daytime televisions syndication, with a stake in the Dr. Phil, Rachel Ray, and Dr. Oz shows.

As in previous years, the Forbes Billionaires List is dominated by inherited money, particularly with women.  The Top 5 men on the Forbes List made their own fortunes, but the top-ranked woman who didn’t inherit or marry into the bulk of her money comes in all the way down at #195.

The net worth of this group range from over $2 billion to nearly $7 billion. Three women on the list come from China, four from the United States, and one each from Switzerland and Spain.

1 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.