TNT sale to UPS blocked by European regulators

TNT Express was set to be absorbed by shipping giant UPS, but the sale was blocked by the European Union's antitrust chief. UPS first offered to buy TNT Express in March to increase its shipping footprint in Europe. 

|
Yves Herman/Reuters/File
European Union Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia holds a news conference on the proposed merger between United Parcel Service Inc and TNT Express in Brussels January 30, 2013. EU antitrust regulators blocked a 5.2 billion euro ($7 billion) bid by UPS for TNT Express as expected, saying the firm had not offered adequate concessions to ensure the deal would not hurt consumers.

The European Union's antitrust chief on Wednesday rejected a $6.9 billion deal for UPS to acquire Dutch delivery company TNT Express and said he was surprised the U.S. group jettisoned the venture when there was still hope for a solution.

Antitrust Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said that European businesses "would have been directly harmed" by the takeover "because it would have drastically reduced choice between providers and probably led to price increases."

UPS had offered in March to buy TNT, Europe's second-largest delivery company, to better compete with Europe's largest, Deutsche Post's DHL. UPS said that it had proposed "tangible remedies" but Almunia said they were "simply not enough."

Sensing a likely rejection, UPS scrapped the acquisition on Jan. 14, hitting the stock price of the Dutch delivery company. The decision surprised Almunia, convinced there still was room to find a compromise.

"I have to confess that I was a little bit surprised because we still had time when they published this statement," Almunia told reporters.

"We have experience that the final elements of a possible solution, a positive alternative, are not found the first day of negotiations but as close as possible to the last day of negotiations," he said.

The Commission reviews major corporate mergers and acquisitions to ensure they do not hurt fair competition in the market. It has the power to block deals or to demand concessions, such as the sale of business parts, to safeguard market balance.

It only was the third merger that Almunia rejected out of some 800 cases since he became the EU's competition commissioner in 2010. Yet is showed the power of the EU's antitrust division in setting the conditions for multinationals to operate in the 27-nation bloc.

The TNT takeover would have been the largest acquisition in UPS's history.

"UPS believes that the combined company would have been transformative for the logistics industry, bringing meaningful benefits to consumers and customers around the world, while supporting much needed growth in Europe in particular," the company said in a statement Wednesday.

Almunia, however, disagreed. The EU found that it would have restricted competition in 15 member states, where the market would have been reduced to just 3 or 2 companies.

The EU was still looking for further concessions from UPS to make the deal palatable when the Atlanta, Ga. company scrapped it.

"We worked hard with UPS on possible remedies until very late in the procedure, but what they offered was simply not enough to address the serious competition problems," Almunia said.

UPS had offered in March to buy TNT, Europe's second-largest delivery company, to better compete with Europe's largest, Deutsche Post's DHL.

Despite the setback, Almunia was convinced TNT Express would remain a viable company.

"I don't think TNT is an ailing firm, not at all," Almunia said. "They are present in the market. I am sure they will continue to be in the market."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to TNT sale to UPS blocked by European regulators
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0131/TNT-sale-to-UPS-blocked-by-European-regulators
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe