Want to help solve political polarization? Maybe start with civility.

|
Screenshot from YouTube
Mark Sappenfield, editor of The Christian Science Monitor, speaks with Alexandra Hudson, author of “The Soul of Civility,” during a Facebook Live event May 7.

Are we overdoing democracy? That might sound like an odd question. But it’s an essential one.

On Tuesday, I talked with Alexandra Hudson, author of “The Soul of Civility: Timeless Principles To Heal Society and Ourselves.” We explored the difference between civility and politeness, and the connection between civility and trust, and we discussed how these ideals stretch across eras and places in a universal way.

But that comment struck a chord. Here’s the full quote.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

Polarization and mistrust are high in American politics today. How do we get out of that spiral? A conversation with Alexandra Hudson offers clues.

“We’re overdoing democracy and undermining democracy,” Ms. Hudson said. “It’s detrimental to our ... freedom and our flourishing but also to our own souls, too – to expect too much out of politics and to derive our ultimate meaning from these issues.”

Have we let politics usurp its proper place in our shared living? That’s Ms. Hudson’s question. If so, civility is one crucial way to right the balance.

Civility is not about politeness – as many people assume. Rather, it’s the unshakable conviction in every human being’s worth and the determination not to be goaded into thinking or acting otherwise. In other words, it’s a commitment to putting humanity first.

In that way, it’s not about sweeping things under the rug. In fact, it can mean the opposite. “Sometimes, actually respecting someone – actually loving someone – requires being impolite, requires having a hard conversation,” she said.

Done right, civility brings perspective, and that perspective is essential to civil society and democracy. It helps us get our priorities right, and in doing so, we build trust by becoming trustworthy ourselves.

If we care only about winning at any cost, we undermine our ability to live together.  

Ms. Hudson pointed to the example of people like Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. “They knew the means mattered,” she said.

“In their pursuit of equal recognition and respect for human dignity, they couldn’t undermine the dignity of some people – their fellow citizens, their fellow human beings – along the way,” Ms. Hudson said.

The good news, she added, is that she sees a “renaissance” of people trying to rebuild society’s ties – and trust. She cited examples of people breaking out of their media and cultural “bubbles” to reach out to people of all backgrounds and become a point of connection.

“We can do that, too,” she said. “That’s the empowering message – that people are doing this, and it’s not a superpower. We can start right now. ... It’s about using what we do have and opening up our homes and hearts to others.”

In the end, it’s not rocket science – or even anything particularly new. From ancient Egypt to ancient China to ancient Greece, thoughtful people have, again and again, come to the same conclusions. These principles are essential to healthy human societies.

It comes down to, “What works when it comes to doing life together, and what doesn’t?” Ms. Hudson said. “And let’s do more of what works, and less of what doesn’t.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Want to help solve political polarization? Maybe start with civility.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2024/0508/Want-to-help-solve-political-polarization-Maybe-start-with-civility
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe