Wal-Mart's pay hike and the cycle of virtues

The world's largest private employer plans a raise for its lowest-paid workers, a sign of a drive in many countries to hike wages to stimulate economies. Firms need to look beyond the bottom line in how they treat employees.

|
AP Photo
Wal-Mart President and Chief Executive Officer Doug McMillon speaks during an AP interview Feb. 17 in Bentonville, Ark. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is spending $1 billion to change how it pays and trains hourly staff.

Surprisingly, so much of the world’s economic future this year seems to depend on the answer to a five-word question:

How much will wages rise?

In the United States, for example, the Federal Reserve awaits growth in wages before it will raise interest rates. The prime ministers in Japan and Britain have lately exhorted companies to hike worker compensation to help ensure growth. Germany, which stands accused of relying too much on exports, raised its minimum wage this year to stimulate consumer demand. And China plans to keep raising worker income to force companies to move toward higher-paying high-tech industries.

“Nothing is more important than wage movement,” said Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda recently about his country’s need to stir consumers to spend more and prevent deflation.

Despite being the world’s largest economy, the US has not seen real wages markedly change for at least a couple decades – until recently. In the fourth quarter of 2014, median weekly earnings for workers aged 16 to 24 went up 4.8 percent – higher than any other age group. For 25 to 34 year olds, the increase was 2.4 percent. The Great Recession that officially ended in 2009 may finally be ending in the paycheck of American workers. Yet Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen hopes for a 3-4 percent rise in wages before the Fed has confidence in a sustainable recovery.

While more US states have lately raised the minimum wage to above the federal level, the bigger news is that big employers find more reasons to motivate their employees. Last year, retail giant Gap Inc. boosted wages on its own as way to improve customer service. In January, insurance giant Aetna said it will follow suit.

And last week, the world’s largest private employer, Wal-Mart – which has long taken pride in its brutal cost-cutting – announced that half-a-million of its low-wage workers will get a raise in April, one that will be above the minimum wage.

As the US unemployment rate drops, Wal-Mart finds it must compete more to recruit and retain low-wage workers and improve the consumer’s experience of its big-box retail chain. Yet it pitches the raise as its largest investment in workers ever, hoping that showing more respect for employees will pay off in workers being more productive.

Economic pressures such as labor supply still can move wages up or down. But often it is the nonmaterial qualities such as respect and a larger purpose that drive a business and its employees.

Many wealthier countries are trying to recreate a virtuous cycle of higher profits, investments, consumption, and wages that feed off each other. Yet at the micro level, it is company leaders who create a cycle of virtues, beyond the financial figures and toward values that drive workers, who can help sustain growth. Wal-Mart’s voluntary move toward higher wages may be just the spin of that cycle to nudge other companies into following its path.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Wal-Mart's pay hike and the cycle of virtues
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0222/Wal-Mart-s-pay-hike-and-the-cycle-of-virtues
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe