Skip to footer

US's shadowy energy partnership with oil-rich Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan has long been a key piece in the US's foreign policy puzzle, writes Nick Cunningham, and news that Congressmen traveled there at the expense of a state-owned oil company is the latest link between the countries.

|
Stringer/Reuters/File
The full moon rises in the background over an oil rig at the Kashagan offshore oil field in the Caspian sea in western Kazakhstan.

Ten Members of the US Congress – along with 32 of their staff members – received secret payments from Azerbaijan’s state-owned oil company to travel to Baku in 2013.

A report from the Washington Post offers an in-depth look into a shadowy relationship between the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) and powerful members of the United States government.

About $750,000 was funneled from SOCAR through US-based non-profits to cover the cost of travel, including souvenirs of “silk scarves, crystal tea sets and Azerbaijani rugs,” the Post reported. The members of Congress attended a conference in Baku on the future of US-Azerbaijan relations.

Although the Office of Congressional Ethics looked into the matter, which the Post called “the most extensive investigation undertaken by the ethics office,” it could not find evidence that the Representatives explicitly acted to benefit SOCAR. However, the report noted that SOCAR had been seeking an exemption from US sanctions on Iran over a natural gas pipeline in the Caspian Sea. Shortly after the conference attended by the members of Congress, President Obama signed an executive order further tightening sanctions on Iran, and the order included language exempting "certain activities relating to the pipeline project to supply natural gas from the Shah Deniz gas field in Azerbaijan to Europe and Turkey."  Similar language appeared previously in an Iran sanctions bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in August 2012. (Related: How Much Longer Can The Oil Age Last?)

But the cozy relationship between SOCAR and Washington, D.C. should not come as a surprise. The US government has long considered Azerbaijan, a country led by one corrupt family since the collapse of the Soviet Union, a key piece of its foreign policy puzzle.

Back in the 1990s, the Clinton administration heavily backed the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, which connected Caspian Sea oil to the international market. Constructed by a consortium headed up by BP, the pipeline had several strategic objectives.

Former US Ambassador Richard Morningstar, a key figure in bringing the BTC about, explained the logic in a 2003 speech at Harvard’s Belfer Center. The Clinton administration wanted to peel away the countries in the Caucuses from Russian influence, help develop Caspian oil (which Clinton thought was important for global supplies), and head off potential pipeline connections through Iran. The US government provided financing options and heavy political support to get the pipeline built. It began operation in 2006 and has since carried more than 2 billion barrels of oil to the Mediterranean coast in Turkey. (Related: Oil Markets Have Little To Fear From Iran For Now)

 

But that involved cozying up to a horribly corrupt government in Baku. Secret cables from American diplomats based in Baku, which were published in 2010, reveal an economy “similar to the feudalism found in Europe during the Middle Ages: a handful of well-connected families control certain geographic areas, as well as certain sectors of the economy.” The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a corruption watchdog based in Sarajevo and Bucharest, awarded Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev with their annual Organized Crime and Corruption Person of the Year award in 2012.

But it wasn’t just the Clinton administration that embraced the corrupt Azerbaijani government. Former Vice President Dick Cheney visited Azerbaijan in 2008 after Russia’s invasion of Georgia, pledging support for the Caucuses. But many think the real reason for his trip was that the US wanted to push an agenda to build another pipeline from the Caspian – the now scrapped proposal for the Nabucco pipeline.

Ambassador Morningstar came back under the Obama administration as special envoy for Eurasian Energy and then as Ambassador to Azerbaijan. He heavily pushed the Nabucco pipeline.

The pipeline never happened, but the effort lives on in the form of another pipeline; this one much closer to becoming a reality.

Although by no means a top priority for the Obama administration, Azerbaijan is still a security ally in the region. The Obama administration sent special State Department envoy Amos Hochstein to Greece in early May to convince the Greek government to back a proposed pipeline to connect Azerbaijani natural gas to Western Europe. The American supported pipeline is in a race against Russia’s Turkish Stream pipeline, which would connect Russian gas to Western Europe by running beneath the Black Sea and through Turkey and Greece. (Related: Which Nation Just Became The World's Top Crude Importer?)

In May 2014, President Obama sent a letter to Aliyev, in which he wrote “[o]n behalf of the US people and myself, I express you and the Azerbaijani people my best wishes on the occasion of Republic Day.” Obama then went on to say, “[w]e appreciate Azerbaijan's participation in the NATO mission in Afghanistan. The two countries have recently established close partnership in the energy sector. We appreciate the signing of the final investment decision as part of the Southern Gas Corridor in December 2013.” Azerbaijan had decided to move forward with the pipeline to Europe, after many years on the drawing board.

The western-backed pipeline is actually two pipelines – one section that runs from Azerbaijan through Turkey, and another that picks up in Greece and runs to Southern Italy. SOCAR is a major shareholder in both.

Even if the Washington Post report doesn’t reveal any wrongdoing on behalf of members of Congress, given the many years in which the US has looked the other way when it comes to corruption in Azerbaijan, owing to the fact that the US wants to develop Caspian energy, the Post report does not come as much of a surprise.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Original story: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Americas-Shadowy-Energy-Partnership-With-Azerbaijan.html

Source: http://oilprice.com/

[Editor's note: This post has been updated on May 19, 2015 to clarify the timeline of sanctions on Iran. Those sanctions did not explicitly exempt SOCAR, as was previously reported.]  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to US's shadowy energy partnership with oil-rich Azerbaijan
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2015/0518/US-s-shadowy-energy-partnership-with-oil-rich-Azerbaijan
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe