Failed launch: Russian satellite now an ex-satellite

A $200 million Russian communications satellite is no more after a Proton rocket broke apart  in flight.

|
TsENKI TV/Spaceflight Now
The Proton rocket blasts off at 3:42 a.m. local time Friday (2142 GMT; 5:42 p.m. EDT Thursday) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.

An advanced Russian communications satellite was destroyed Thursday (May 15) when its Proton rocket booster failed minutes after liftoff from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.

The Express AM4R spacecraft, worth approximately $200 million, was supposed to begin a 15-year mission beaming radio, television, broadband Internet and telephone services across Russia and neighboring countries.

But a few minutes after the 12,720-pound (5,770-kilogram) Express AM4R satellite launched from Baikonur, Russia's primary space base, its Proton rocket ran into a problem. [How Russia's Proton Rockets Work (Infographic)]

The failure occurred during the third stage of the Proton's ascent into orbit, according to a statement by the Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, the Moscow-based manufacturer of the Proton launcher.

An announcer declared an emergency during a live webcast of the launch, and Khrunichev's statement also described the incident as an "emergency situation."

Khrunichev said experts were analyzing telemetry to determine the cause of the failure.

A report by Interfax said debris from the rocket may have fallen the Altai or Amur regions of Russia's Far East.

Spewing a brilliant flame of blue exhaust, the 19-story Proton rocket lifted off at 2142 GMT (5:42 p.m. EDT) to start a nine-hour flight to deploy the powerful European-built Express AM4R telecommunications satellite for Russian government and commercial customers.

The launch was at 3:42 a.m. local time at Baikonur.

The hydrazine-fueled rocket disappeared from the view of a ground-based tracking camera a few minutes later, with no visible signs of any trouble.

But a problem occurred about 545 seconds, or about 9 minutes, after liftoff, according to a report by the semi-official Itar-Tass news agency.

Another report by the Interfax media service said the time of the failure was about 500 seconds after launch.

Both of the times reported for the anomaly occurred during the firing of the Proton rocket's third stage, which is powered by an RD-0213 main engine generating 131,000 pounds of thrust. A four-nozzle vernier steering engine is also mounted on the third stage to keep the rocket pointed in the right direction.

The rocket's guidance, navigation and control system is a triple-redundant digital avionics package on the third stage.

Thursday's mishap marks the fifth launch failure of the Proton rocket or its Breeze M upper stage in 36 flights since December 2010. Another Proton/Breeze M mission put the Russian Yamal 402 communications satellite in the wrong orbit, but the spacecraft was able to boot itself to the correct location.

The string of mishaps has brought focus on the quality control procedures of Khrunichev and its suppliers, with the Russian space contrator announcing expanded inspections, video monitoring in its factories and other measures to bolster the Proton's reliability.

Thursday's launch was the 397th Proton mission since 1965. Overall, the rocket has a success record matching the world's leading satellite launchers.

Officials said Proton rockets would likely be grounded until investigators find the cause of Thursday's failure and issue corrective recommendations. After a Proton rocket veered out of control moments after a launch in July 2013, an inquiry found technicians installed accelerometers in the rocket upside down, resulting in a two-month grounding of the Proton vehicle.

International Launch Services, a Virginia-based firm owned by Khrunichev, manages commercial Proton rocket missions. Thursday's flight was conducted under the auspices of Khrunichev as part of Russia's federal space program.

The five Proton or Breeze M launch failures since December 2010 have all been on Russian federal missions. Only the partial launch failure on the Yamal 402 mission was on an ILS flight.

ILS officials say they offer additional mission assurance services on Proton launches under their responsibility. The ILS Proton is one of the three leading rockets in the international launch market, alongside the European Ariane 5 and SpaceX's Falcon 9. [See a video of the Proton rocket failure]

Built by Airbus Defence and Space, the Express AM4R spacecraft was supposed to cover Russia and neighboring countries with four communications bands and 10 antennas, supplying users with television, broadband Internet, telephone and mobile services.

Express AM4R was owned by the Russian Satellite Communications Co., a state-owned operator that serves a mix of government and commercial users.

The Proton rocket's Breeze M upper stage was programmed to take over control of the mission about 11 minutes after liftoff with a series of five engine burns to put the Express AM4R satellite into a high-altitude geostationary transfer orbit, a waypoint on the way to the craft's final operating position 22,300 miles over the equator.

But the core three-stage Proton booster, which was designed to propel the Breeze M and its payload on a suborbital trajectory, was unable to complete its job.

Express AM4R was ordered by RSCC from Airbus, then known as Astrium Satellites, in 2012 to replace a satellite lost on a previous Proton/Breeze M failure.

The spacecraft was to be positioned in geostationary orbit at 80 degrees east longitude.

Described by RSCC as Russia's most powerful communications satellite, it was based on the Eurostar E3000 platform built by Airbus.

The satellite carried 63 transponders in C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band and L-band.

The launch of Express AM4R was part of a strategic expansion by RSCC, which said it planned eight satellite launches from 2013 to 2015, doubling the company's communications capacity.

Follow Stephen Clark @StephenClark1. Copyright 2014 Spaceflightnow.com, all rights reserved.

Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Failed launch: Russian satellite now an ex-satellite
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0516/Failed-launch-Russian-satellite-now-an-ex-satellite
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe