Should we drop nuclear bombs on Mars? Why Elon Musk says yes.

Space X's CEO shared a novel idea with Stephen Colbert on CBS last night. Is he serious? 

|
Jae C. Hong/AP/File
Elon Musk introduces the SpaceX Dragon V2 spaceship at the SpaceX headquarters in 2014. Last night, Musk shared further ideas on how to colonize Mars.

The prospect of traveling to Mars has been on the table for decades, but never before has it seemed so attainable.

Elon Musk, CEO of Space Exploration Technologies Corp and Tesla Motors Inc., won’t rest until he sees a colony on Mars. “Mars is as urgent and crucial as lifting billions out of poverty, or eradicating deadly disease,” said Mr. Musk in an interview with Aeon Magazine.

But Wednesday night, Musk made even more drastic comments on CBS's “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.”

For humans to exist on Mars, the "fixer upper of a planet" would need to be made more Earth-like, accomplished by jump-starting climate change. According to Musk, there are two ways to do this: introduce greenhouse gasses or “drop thermonuclear weapons over the poles.”

The latter is preferable, Musk says, because it’s quicker, and Musk is all about speed.

Musk says in just two to three years, humans could be transported into space by SpaceX rockets and that by 2020, people could be traveling to Mars. That’s an estimate that beats NASA’s by ten years.

So is Musk just crazy or is this viable?

Well, every 26 months, a trip to the Red Planet becomes much easier. The orbital differences between Mars and Earth fluctuate significantly, and at its furthest, Mars is a thousand times further from Earth than the moon. But every 26 months, the two planets align, and then Mars is only 150 times further than the moon. A mere 36 million miles away.

By 2040, Musk believes SpaceX will be poised, essentially, to change the future of humanity. “If we have linear improvement in technology, as opposed to logarithmic, then we should have a significant base on Mars, perhaps with thousands or tens of thousands of people,” Musk told Aeon Magazine.

Extreme Tech’s John Hewitt, engineer and neuroscientist, is skeptical. “The problem is that at planetary scales, even with nukes, terraforming is like designing a new Tesla with a lodestone compass where the fancy new GPS console should be — it will look ridiculous when you try to resell it,” he says.

“A few well-placed nukes may inject some heat or alter radiative transfer. But unless you are willing to coexist with an ongoing barrage of nukes every time the climate doesn’t behave, you should probably steer clear of the Mars signup sheet.”

Despite opposition, Musk isn’t slowing down. “If we can establish a Mars colony, we can almost certainly colonize the whole Solar System,” Musk told Aeon’s Ross Andersen. “But the key is that we have to make the Mars thing work. If we’re going to have any chance of sending stuff to other star systems, we need to be laser-focused on becoming a multi-planet civilization. That’s the next step."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Should we drop nuclear bombs on Mars? Why Elon Musk says yes.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0910/Should-we-drop-nuclear-bombs-on-Mars-Why-Elon-Musk-says-yes
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe