Siberian 'unicorn' lived for much longer than we thought

New radiometric dating of Siberian 'unicorn' fossils reveal that the prehistoric rhinoceros lived for hundreds of thousands of years longer than previously believed.

|
DiBgd/WikiMedia Commons
Elasmotherium sibiricum, also known as the Siberian unicorn, is depicted in an illustrated image.

New data is changing the dates surrounding the mysterious history of the Siberian 'unicorn.'

The hulking Elasmotherium sibiricum has earned the mythical name despite sharing little other than a prominent horn with most pop-culture depictions of the mythical unicorn.

But the biggest surprise here isn’t the aesthetics, it's the timing.

Scientists previously believed the Siberian unicorn had gone extinct 350,000 years ago, but new findings suggest that date may need to be revised by hundreds of thousands of years.

A team of scientists from Tomsk State University in Russia analyzed a newly discovered fossilized Siberian unicorn skull, found in Kazakhstan with fossils of mammoths and prehistoric bison. Dating the fossils revealed the startling timing, published in the American Journal of Applied Science.

How did this "unicorn" survive hundreds of thousands of years longer than expected? Its ancestors may have migrated into a comparatively gentle microclimate, suggest researchers, or else it might be the last vestige of a larger population that had died out across the rest of its once vast terrain.

"Most likely, in the south of Western Siberia it was a refúgium, where this rhino had preserved the longest in comparison with the rest of its range,” said Andrey Shpanski, a paleontologist with Tomsk University, in a press release.

Siberian unicorns were massive creatures, up to 15 feet long and with an estimated weight of around 8,000-10,000 pounds – bigger than an Asian or African forest elephant. These prehistoric rhinos, like their modern cousins, had a large horn on their head, used for defense, and were herbivores. Their territory would have stretched across of much of what is now eastern Russia and Kazakhstan, from the Don River almost to Mongolia.

Their fossils have been identified at multiple sites, and estimates of their extinction remained consistently at around 350,000 years old. Then this team of scientists found an unusually large E. sibiricum skull near the Kozhamzhar village in the Pavlodar region of Kazakhstan.

An analysis of the skull concluded two things: the skull likely belonged to a very large male, with exact measurements hard to estimate without a fossilized body, and it died 29,000 years ago.

According to the study, that timing “significantly complicates” many of the findings and research based on extinction periods and creates questions around the estimated dates of many other "ancient" fossils, since many of them are dated only with respect to each other, and not using radiocarbon isotope measurements.

The authors say more radiocarbon dating of other fossils could help resolve these challenges.

Scientists use fossils to draw conclusions about past environments, to provide reference points for how the planet acts now.

“Understanding of the past allows us to make more accurate predictions about natural processes in the near future: it also concerns climate change," said Dr. Shpanski.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Siberian 'unicorn' lived for much longer than we thought
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0329/Siberian-unicorn-lived-for-much-longer-than-we-thought
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe