'The Notebook' is alternately powerful and perplexing

'The Notebook,' which follows twins forced to take shelter during the end of World War II with their grandmother in what is presumably Hungary, stars László and András Gyémánt and is directed by János Szász.

|
Christian Berger/Sony Pictures Classics
Two brothers (László and András Gyémánt) must fight to survive in ‘The Notebook.’

Set in the waning days of World War II, “The Notebook,” directed by Hungarian János Szász, is based on the celebrated French-language bestseller by Agota Kristof about 13-year-old twin brothers forced to take shelter with their unconsoling peasant grandmother in her countryside shack. The boys, played by László and András Gyémánt, are unnamed in the film (though not in the novel), as is also true of practically everybody else, and the setting, though presumably Hungary, is equally undefined. Szász is trying for a timeless effect, and, for him, this means going light on the specifics.

Alternately powerful and perplexing, “The Notebook” plays out as an allegory that might have been lifted from a particularly grim Grimm’s fairy tale. When the film opens, the boys’ soldier father (Ulrich Matthes), heading to the front, counsels his sons to write down their daily experiences in a notebook while he’s gone. Because twins are conspicuous – a danger in wartime – he also tries to convince his wife (Gyöngyvér Bognár) to separate the boys. Instead, she delivers them to the crone mother she hasn’t spoken to in 20 years and who didn’t even know she had grandchildren. 

Not that it would have mattered. This knobby old woman refers to the boys only as “bastards.” She, in turn, is called “the witch” by the local villagers, who believe, probably not without reason, that she once poisoned her husband. The old woman beats the boys, locks them out, and makes them work for every slurp of soup she places before them. 

The boys quickly size up their predicament. To survive this woman and the wider war, they will have to steel themselves to endure pain. They undergo a self-made regimen – hitting themselves, starving themselves, burning the photos of their mother – in order to blank out their humanity. They befriend a local girl, a thief, and their survivalist escapades become increasingly harrowing. Murder and vengeance are executed without a twinge of remorse.

Szász wants to demonstrate how war’s horrors leave us as soulless husks. But he doesn’t show us enough of what these boys were like before they turned themselves into zombies. The two young actors, new to the profession, are blank-faced throughout. We are left with the unintended implication that they were husks from the get-go. This deranges the movie’s import.

At its best, the movie summons up the nightmarishness of another novel, Kosinski’s “The Painted Bird,” but it’s highly schematic. The village is peopled almost exclusively by worst-case specimens: The local priest is scurvy; the townsfolk are vicious. It’s not enough that the encamped Nazi officer is a Nazi – he’s also sexually aberrant. A movie about the inhumanity that war engenders should not remove from the scene all traces of humanity, or else what is there to compare? In the name of unblinking realism, Szász overdoes the allegory. There are no sacrificial gestures here, no heroism, no tears. He comes on as truth-teller, but he’s only telling half the truth. Grade: B- (Rated R for disturbing violent and sexual content, nudity, and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'The Notebook' is alternately powerful and perplexing
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2014/0829/The-Notebook-is-alternately-powerful-and-perplexing
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe