Skip to footer

Mitt Romney's five biggest liabilities as GOP nominee

Typically, an election with an incumbent president on the ballot is a referendum on him. But President Obama is trying to turn the tables. So what exactly does Mitt Romney bring to the table, in both positive and negative ways? Here are the liabilities:

3. Mormonism

Douglas C. Pizac/AP/File
Temple Square in Salt Lake City, the home of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

  • By Linda Feldmann Staff writer

Romney’s devout Mormon faith hindered his ability to lock up the Republican nomination early, as many evangelical voters – a key part of the GOP base – were unwilling to vote for him. They view the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a cult and not Christian, and some worry that if Romney is elected president, it will help the church attract new members.

Some polls show that Democrats are more wary than Republicans of voting for a Mormon for president. Still, the Mormon factor was a greater hurdle during the primaries than it will be during the general. Some Republicans wish Romney would discuss his pastoral activities as a church leader, counseling people with health, financial, and marital problems, as a way to warm up his image and show his compassion for others. But so far, that has not become a regular part of his stump speech.

Now, despite his Mormonism, most Christian conservatives say they plan to vote for Romney, because he’s better than Obama. But even if a 4 or 5 percent decide to stay home rather than vote for a Mormon, that could hurt Romney’s chances in critical swing states like Florida, Ohio, and Virginia.

3 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.