US swim team disqualified for .01 second mistake

US swim team disqualified: Kevin Cordes jumped into the water a little early in his leg of the 4x100 medley relay at the world swimming championship. The US swim team has never lost this race, except when it's been disqualified.

|
(AP Photo/Daniel Ochoa de Olza)
The United States Men's 4x100m medley relay team, from left: Adrian Nathan, Ryan Lochte, Kevin Cordes and Matt Grevers react after being disqualified at the FINA Swimming World Championships in Barcelona, Spain, Sunday, Aug. 4, 2013.

Matt Grevers scratched his temple, wondering what went wrong.

Nathan Adrian and Ryan Lochte stared at the scoreboard with their jaws dropped wide open in disbelief. Kevin Cordes stood on the deck with his hands on his head.

U.S. men's head coach Bob Bowman summed it up best. "That's like a punch in the gut right there," he said.

Moments earlier, all four swimmers were embracing each other, again celebrating that surest of gold medals in the pool — the men's 4x100 medley relay.

It's a race the U.S. has never lost — except for disqualification.

Since the race's inception at the 1976 Montreal Games, the Americans' only defeat at a worlds or Olympics came at the 2007 worlds in Melbourne, Australia, when Ian Crocker dove in too soon for the butterfly leg in morning heats.

This time, the disqualification came during the final, before a crowd of 10,000 screaming fans inside the sweaty Palau Sant Jordi on Sunday. And after Adrian touched the wall first in the anchor leg by nearly 1.5 seconds — an eternity in swimming.

Cordes, a 19-year-old competing at his first worlds, dove in for his breaststroke leg 0.04 seconds before Matt Grevers touched the wall to complete his backstroke leg.

The rules allow a leeway of 0.03, so it was 0.01 over the limit — the smallest margin possible.

"It's as much my fault or more than Kevin's," Grevers said. "The guy coming in is usually the one responsible. I kind of slipped off my start and got a little more tired than I wanted to at the end.

"I probably had a slower rate than I was anticipating — obviously than he was anticipating," Grevers added. "I got to learn to finish better and he's probably got to learn to time a little better. I have a feeling Kevin's going to be a little safe for the next couple years."

When "DQ" was placed next to United States on the scoreboard, France moved up to take the gold, while the silver went to Australia and Japan snatched the bronze.

Afterward, Cordes was escorted past reporters without saying a word, while his teammates addressed the failure.

"A relay disqualification is not a particular individual's fault," Adrian said. "It's Team USA's fault and it falls on all of our shoulders.

"If us four ever step up again we're never going to have a disqualification, that's for sure," Adrian added. "It will really motivate him. I don't doubt if in the next couple years we're going to have the fastest breaststroker in the world swimming for Team USA. This could be a catalyst for that."

The entire meet has been difficult for Cordes.

After winning the 100 and 200 breast at the U.S. trials, his best result here was seventh in the 100. He failed to advance from morning heats in the 50 and just missed out on qualifying for the final in the 200, finishing ninth and missing the cut by 0.02.

"It's a big step up to come here," Bowman said. "This is a great learning experience, because DQ-ing a relay in the first world championships of the quad is one thing, doing it in an Olympic prep competition would be 10 times worse, right? So it's a good learning experience and they have to go back and rethink how they're going to react to things in this environment and do better."

Until the DQ, the biggest concern for the Americans was how to replace the retired Michael Phelps, who swam the butterfly leg for the last decade.

Ryan Lochte took over that job and did it so well that he put the U.S. back ahead after Cordes touched second. Lochte wouldn't talk about his performance, though.

His sole focus was on the team.

"You take 0.04 off our time and we're still a second in front of everyone," he said. "We have all the speed and everything is right there. We just got a little carried away, and I guess things happen. But more fuel for the fire. We're going to come back next year stronger and better."

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to US swim team disqualified for .01 second mistake
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0805/US-swim-team-disqualified-for-.01-second-mistake
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe