Nigeria military acknowledges mistake in accidental bombing of a refugee camp

At least 76 people were killed in Tuesday's accidental Nigerian Air Force strike on a refugee camp as aid workers scramble to help more than 100 wounded.

|
Medecins Sans Frontieres/AP
Smoke rises from a burnt out shelter at a camp for displaced people in Rann, Nigeria, on Tuesday Jan. 17, 2017. Relief volunteers are believed to be among the more than 100 dead after a Nigerian Air Force jet fighter mistakenly bombed the refugee camp, while on a mission against Boko Haram extremists.

Nigeria’s accidental bombing of a refugee camp on Tuesday has put a spotlight on the struggles this African nation faces as it continues its fight against Islamic militants. 

The strike, which initially intended to target Boko Haram extremists, mistakenly killed at least 76 civilians, and left at least 46 “severely injured,” in a refugee camp. The Nigerian military has faced much criticism from multiple international organizations as they acknowledged making such a mistake for the first time.

The camp, which was set up by the United Nations in March in Rann, Borno state in a remote northeast region near the border with Cameroon, hosts 43,000 people who have fled Boko Haram. 

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi said in a statement Wednesday that he was shocked to learn about the news. 

“This has been a truly catastrophic event. Lives have been lost, and this in a designated site for the displaced,” Mr. Grandi said. “A full accounting has to take place so that the causes are known and measures can be put in place to ensure this never happens again.”

Various sources have provided different accounts of the number of casualties, as neither the Nigeria Air Force nor the government have provided any official count. 

The International Committee for the Red Cross estimated the death toll is at least 76 people, including six Nigeria Red Cross volunteers, and more than 100 people injured. The aid group Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said 52 people died and 120 were wounded from this air strike. Nigerian government officials told the Associated Press that more than 100 people, including refugees and aid workers, were killed.

The Red Cross said at least 90 patients remained in Rann, the epicenter of the area where the extremist group had attempted to change into an Islamic caliphate in the northeast for the past seven years.

While Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari said recently they have crushed the militant group and driven it out of its strongholds, the strike followed several weeks of military offense against the group. 

The massive civilian death tolls caused by the Nigeria Air Force’s strike, however, was seen as the first time that the officials acknowledged making such a mistake. 

Using air power in this late phase of a counterinsurgency is ham-fisted,” said Matthew Page, a consultant who until recently was the State Department’s top expert on Nigeria, to The New York Times. “The Nigerian government would be wise to use carefully targeted, intelligence-driven operations, not aerial bombing campaigns, to mop up what’s left of Boko Haram.”

In the region where the military continues to combat the Islamic extremists, who have killed more than 20,000 people and forcibly displaced 2.6 million, villagers have reported civilian casualties in near-daily bombings.

“The accidental bombing is not a true reflection of the level of professionalism,” said Lai Mohammed, Nigeria’s information minister, according to Reuters. 

This story includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Nigeria military acknowledges mistake in accidental bombing of a refugee camp
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2017/0118/Nigeria-military-acknowledges-mistake-in-accidental-bombing-of-a-refugee-camp
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe