South Africa’s ANC may need to partner up. Who will they choose?

For the first time in South Africa’s democratic history, the African National Congress is posed to lose its majority. The ANC may be forced to form a coalition with some of its larger, rival parties.

|
Jerome Delay/AP
South African President Ramaphosa of the African National Congress speaks to supporters in Johannesburg, South Africa, on May 25, 2024. Mr. Ramaphosa and the ANC face an uncertain future as they appear unlikely to secure a majority in the national election.

For the first time in South Africa’s democratic era, the African National Congress (ANC) will have to seek a coalition partner to govern with after it was on course to fall well short of a majority in the national election.

Here are scenarios of what could happen next in South Africa and which parties the ANC might partner with:

Will Ramaphosa get outsed?

With results in from over 70% of polling stations, the ANC had just under 42% of votes, by far its worst result since democratic elections began after the end of apartheid in 1994 and leaving it short of a majority in Parliament.

Some political analysts say this could lead to party leader and South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa having to step down.

Over the past four electoral cycles the ANC’s share of the vote gradually dropped but never by more than 5 percentage points from one election to the next.

If the vote share of 42% or below is confirmed, the party could seek to oust Mr. Ramaphosa as its leader and nominate another high-profile politician such as Deputy President Paul Mashatile or Gwede Mantashe, currently in charge of the mines and energy ministry, to the National Assembly to elect as South African president. A more probable scenario could see Mr. Ramaphosa carry on for a while to broker a coalition deal with another party in a bid to secure a parliamentary majority and then hand over to a successor, analysts say. When asked on May 31 whether Mr. Ramaphosa would have to resign after the dismal election result, ANC First Deputy Secretary-General Nomvula Mokonyane said, “Nobody is going to resign.”

In any case, the ANC needs to move quickly as the constitution says the new National Assembly must convene within 14 days of the election results being declared, which is expected to happen on June 2, to elect a new president.

Who are the potential coalition partners?

Depending on the final numbers, the ANC may have no choice but to seek support from one of its larger rivals: the pro-business, white-led Democratic Alliance (DA), uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK), led by former president Jacob Zuma, or the Marxist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).

The price of a deal with either of those would likely be significant policy concessions by the ANC, as well as the offer of some senior government positions for their partner.

Analysts say it is difficult to envisage a stable arrangement under this scenario, and South Africa could be facing a period of unprecedented government volatility. Investors and the business community would prefer a deal with the DA, which has received 22.6% of votes counted so far, and is seen as more market-friendly.

However, many analysts think the ideological divide between the ANC and the leading opposition party is so wide as to make such a deal difficult, if not impossible.

Led by Julius Malema, a former leader of the ANC’s youth wing, the EFF may be a more natural fit for the ANC, but relations are tense between Mr. Malema and some ANC factions. The EFF, on 9.5% of the vote, said in April it would partner with the ANC if it got the powerful post of finance minister. The ANC, which has not disclosed its thinking on any non-majority scenario, would be unlikely to agree to this unless it were hugely weakened.

Steven Friedman, an academic affiliated with the University of Johannesburg and Rhodes University, said it was hard to imagine the ANC and the EFF governing together for five years.

He cited their inability last year to agree on a constitutional change on land reform even though their positions on the issue are closely aligned. A deal with the MK, currently emerging as the third biggest party with around 12%, would also be difficult to digest for the ANC, which struggled to clean its reputation after the corruption scandals of the Zuma era.

“What we do know now is that the ANC is in a trilemma,” said Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh, a political analyst at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.

“The ANC will have to decide whether it goes with its historical partners, the EFF and MK, or whether it takes an unprecedented step of reaching across the aisle of South African politics in a grand coalition with the DA.

“Anyone of those coalitions is politically unprecedented,” he said. “It remains to be seen to what extent that represents a true policy shift in South Africa.”

Less likely scenarios

If the ANC gets a last-minute boost to secure over 45% of the vote, which looks out of reach at this stage, it could try to make a deal with small- or medium-sized parties to form a government.

Analysts have said the socially conservative Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), which is strong in KwaZulu-Natal province and is polling at about 3% nationally, could be the ANC’s first choice, but its support would be insufficient to secure a majority.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to South Africa’s ANC may need to partner up. Who will they choose?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2024/0531/ANC-south-africa-elections-ramaphosa
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe