NATO fatalities in Afghanistan: 22 percent this year at hands of Afghan Army, police

Gen. John Allen urged Congress yesterday to 'stay the course' but offered little encouraging data.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Marine Gen. John Allen, the top US commander in Afghanistan (r.) testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, before the House Armed Services Committee hearing on Afghanistan.

Gen. John Allen, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, gave a typically upbeat assessment of the war's progress to Congress yesterday. He urged lawmakers to "stay the course," claimed that "the campaign is on track," and that the multibillion dollar effort to train and expand the Afghan military is going well.

Perhaps. But his remarks, which come after US troops burned Qurans at an airbase outside Kabul and the apparent murder of 16 Afghan civilians in their homes in the south of the country by a US sergeant, also acknowledged the increasing toll on NATO troops in the country from their erstwhile Afghan partners.

Allen said 60 NATO troops from six countries, most from the US, have been killed in Afghanistan this year. Of those, 13 have been killed by Afghan security forces, he said. That's 22 percent of the total. Allen said some of the Afghan soldiers and police who killed foreign troops "were motivated, we believe in part, by the mishandling of religious materials.”

Allen said the war in general is going very well. “I can tell you, unequivocally, three things. First, we remain on track to ensure that Afghanistan will no longer be a safe haven for [Al Qaeda] and will no longer be terrorized by the Taliban,” he said. “Second, as a coalition … we are well along in our progress to meet our 2010 [NATO] commitments to transition security lead to the Afghan national security forces by December 2014. Third, our troops know the difference they are making, and the enemy feels it every day.”

But there was little in the way of hard metrics to measure that progress. “I wish I could tell you that this war was simple, and that progress could be easily measured,” Allen said. “But that’s not the way of counterinsurgencies. They are fraught with success and setbacks, which can exist in the same space and time, but each must be seen in the larger context of the overall campaign. And I believe that the campaign is on track."

Follow Dan Murphy on Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to  NATO fatalities in Afghanistan: 22 percent this year at hands of Afghan Army, police
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2012/0321/NATO-fatalities-in-Afghanistan-22-percent-this-year-at-hands-of-Afghan-Army-police
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe