Modern field guide to security and privacy

Podcast: Why a Ukraine-style hack on US power grid isn't likely

Rob Lee, cofounder of cybersecurity company Dragos Security, who personally investigated the Ukraine hack, downplays the imminent risk of a major, isolated attack on the US power grid. 

|
Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor.
Rob Lee speaks at a recent Passcode event on securing the US power grid.

The December cyberattack that left more than 200,000 people in the dark in Western Ukraine left many experts wondering: Could US adversaries pull off a similar operation and take down a portion of the American power grid?

That's not so likely right now, says Rob Lee, cofounder of cybersecurity company Dragos Security, who personally investigated the Ukraine hack. "The idea that we're going to randomly see a crippling attack on the power grid for no reason whatsoever is absurd," Mr. Lee said on the latest edition on The Cybersecurity Podcast.

Some experts and officials linked the malicious software found on the infected Ukrainian systems to Russian hackers. Tensions between the two countries have remained high in the aftermath of Moscow's controversial annexation of Crimea, a region previously tied to Ukraine.

Yet those who might be actively seeking to plot attacks against the US right now – in particular, terror groups – are ill-equipped to take down the country's critical infrastructure, says Lee, a former Air Force cyberoperations officer who also worked in counterterrorism in the military. 

Terror groups such as the Islamic State do not "have the capability to develop long-term operations to get into the power grid and develop specific engineering knowledge capable of causing physical destruction to infrastructure or causing long disruptions [in service]. It's just not possible," Lee says. However, he added, "we need to be careful as we become more interconnected and it becomes easier." 

Also in this episode: Podcast cohost Peter Singer, senior strategist at New America, discusses innovative ways to get more kids involved in cybersecurity – and not just at university level. Cohost Sara Sorcher, deputy editor of the Christian Science Monitor’s Passcode, explains the surprising findings in her recent article about what the US government really thinks about encryption.

Listen to this episode 

Follow all episodes: iTunes | Soundcloud | Stitcher 

Follow the hosts: Peter W. Singer | Sara Sorcher 

Learn more about this podcast 

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Podcast: Why a Ukraine-style hack on US power grid isn't likely
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2016/0621/Podcast-Why-a-Ukraine-style-hack-on-US-power-grid-isn-t-likely
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe