Faith, education, and the challenge facing America

Christian teachings are increasingly finding their way into public education, raising the question: should the government be employed to stop the decline of religious belief in America?

|
ABC/1965 United Feature Syndicate Inc./AP/File
Charlie Brown and Linus appear in a scene from “A Charlie Brown Christmas,” created by Charles Schulz in 1965.

As I read the recent Monitor Weekly cover story on increased inclusion of the Bible and Christian values in public education by Jackie Valley, I couldn’t help but think of Charlie Brown.

When my children were younger, we would watch “A Charlie Brown Christmas” every year, and one thing always astonished me. In the middle of the show, for a full minute, the lights dim, the music stops, and Linus recites the story of the birth of Jesus according to the Gospel of Luke. He concludes, “That’s what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown.”

From my vantage point in late-2010s Massachusetts, it seemed utterly extraordinary that something so indispensable to American culture could be so unabashedly Christian.

Fast-forward to 2024, and Christian teachings are finding their way into much more official channels. Jackie’s story touches on efforts in Oklahoma to establish the Bible as an integral part of public education. The goal is clear: to ensure that the Bible has a preeminent place in Oklahoma society.

We’ve profiled other communities taking different approaches. Two years ago, we wrote a cover story about the various ways parents and communities are trying to teach values as Christianity’s dominant place in American culture recedes. This shift has caused alarm for many religious conservatives, who lament the loss of what had felt like a shared moral foundation.

In 1965, when “A Charlie Brown Christmas” came out, 72% of Americans were members of a church, mosque, or synagogue. But today, less than half of Americans (47%) are, according to Gallup. Statistics also show Christianity is declining nationwide. Should government be employed to stop that decline? How? For which denominations? And is that a slippery slope to giving the government coercive powers over individual rights of conscience?

Today, there is a lot of talk of Christian nationalism. I sometimes worry that has become too blunt a term, sweeping together both neo-Nazis and people who feel that the Christian principles that informed America’s founding deserve to be honored.

Yet concerns about the weakening of the separation of church and state are no liberal imagining. And they take on broader significance when considered within the context of recent surges in anti-Muslim and antisemitic rhetoric and violence, in the United States and around the world.

But is there space in the national conversation for compassion and an understanding of those who say they feel marginalized in their own country?

Perhaps the real challenge facing America today is to find a way to answer that question honestly and universally, without marginalizing others in the process. As Linus might say, “That’s what America is all about, Charlie Brown.”

This column was first published in the Dec. 9, 2024, issue of The Christian Science Monitor Weekly magazine. Subscribe today to receive future issues of the Monitor Weekly delivered to your home.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Faith, education, and the challenge facing America
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2024/1211/Christianity-education-America
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe