Big sporting events hurt productivity? No!
We don't live to work. Play is important.
Jockey Corey Brown (right) powers to victory in the Melbourne Cup on his horse Shocking ahead of Kerrin McEvoy on Crime Scene in the November 2009 race. Estimates of lost productivity this year from workers watching the race on company time have reached Australian $1 billion.
William West/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom/File
Among the sports-related economic nonsense that gets tossed about in the media are calculations of “lost productivity” associated with things like the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. Here’s the latest instance, on one of the great days in Australian horse racing, the Melbourne Cup:
While Melbourne Cup day is a public holiday in Melbourne, time taken off by workers across Australia could be costing the nation about $1 billion in lost productivity, according to a new survey.
The survey, by recruitment firm Ranstad, found that almost half the employees it surveyed took more than three-and-a-half hours off work on Melbourne Cup Day.
Australian Bureau of Statistics figures indicated about 11.2 million people were currently in full-time work in Australia, earning on average $31.40 an hour.
“If our results are representative of Australian businesses, we could be losing about $1 billion in the afternoon of the Cup,” Ranstad chief executive Deb Loveridge said in a statement.
The figures are based on the survey’s calculations that there are about 31 million hours in lost productivity on Cup Day.
The problem with these calculations is that we don’t live to work, we work to live better! Economic theory interprets the $1 billion in lost output associated with the Melbourne Cup as a lower bound on the value that Australians place on the occasion. Otherwise they wouldn’t choose to forgo work and take in the races. Economics may be referred to as the “dismal science,” but in this case a proper understanding of economics reveals that the alleged cost, or loss, or what have you, gives us a sense of how valuable the Melbourne Cup is to the many people who take time away from work to enjoy it.
If you read the newspaper story, it seems that the creator of the figure, Ms. Loveridge, gets the idea that the benefits exceed the costs. But selling papers requires a negative spin I suppose, hence the title of the piece: “The race that costs the nation.” Ugh!
Add/view comments on this post.
------------------------------
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.