US moves to remove gray wolf protections

It has been up for debate whether or not the gray wolf’s status as an endangered and threatened species will change. A new proposal gives authority to state wildlife agencies and furthers the trend of environmental deregulation.

The Snake River wolf pack is captured by a remote camera photo in Wallowa County, Ore. A proposal to strip gray wolves of their remaining federal protections could clip the predators' rapid expansion across the U.S. West and Great Lakes.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife/AP

March 14, 2019

Gray wolves in the United States would be stripped of federal protection and subjected to hunting and trapping in more states under a proposal released Thursday that declares the predators recovered following a decades-long restoration effort.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to revoke the wolves' endangered and threatened species status and put them under authority of state wildlife agencies across the Lower 48 states. The Associated Press reported last week that the proposal was in the works.

"The facts are clear and indisputable – the gray wolf no longer meets the definition of a threatened or endangered species," acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said.

Why many in Ukraine oppose a ‘land for peace’ formula to end the war

Wildlife advocates and some members of Congress say the move is premature because wolves occupy only a fraction of a historical range that once stretched across most of North America.

But state officials, livestock interests, and hunters want the government to make it easier to kill wolves. The predators periodically prey on livestock such as cows and sheep and have been blamed for declining numbers of elk, moose, and other big game in some areas.

Trapping, poisoning, and hunting campaigns early last century exterminated wolves across most of the Lower 48 states by the 1930s. More than 6,000 of the animals now live in portions of nine states, officials say.

A final decision on lifting protections will follow a public comment period that begins Friday and runs through May 14.

Government officials said their goal was to protect wolves from extinction, not return them to everywhere they were once found.

Howard University hoped to make history. Now it’s ready for a different role.

The Endangered Species Act is not "a means to keep species from being hunted in perpetuity once they've met the threshold of recovery," said Gavin Shire, spokesman for the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Environmentalists and animal advocacy groups have pledged to challenge in court any action to ease or eliminate protections.

Putting gray wolves under state control would allow Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin to resume hunting and trapping blocked by a 2014 court ruling that returned them to the endangered list.

In other areas, such as the Pacific Northwest, wildlife officials say they have no immediate plans for hunting but could consider it in the future.

Aside from Alaska only three states – Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming – currently allow the public to hunt wolves.

More than 600 were killed in the Northern Rockies states during the most recent hunting and trapping seasons.

Court rulings delayed hunting in the Northern Rockies for years after wolves reached the government's benchmark for recovery in the early 2000s. Members of the region's Congressional delegation ultimately inserted a rider into a budget bill that forced the animals off the endangered list.

Protections will be retained under Thursday's proposal for two small populations of related species – the Mexican gray wolf in New Mexico and Arizona and the red wolf in North Carolina.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.