From ‘skrzypce’ to ‘syzygy,’ falling in l-o-v-e with spelling

Students work on their letters at Bagnall Elementary School in Groveland, Massachusetts, in 2002.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff/File

September 13, 2023

I make no bones about it. I love to spell. The seed was planted early on.

I recall once, when I was about 8, walking with my mother down a busy city street crowded with Christmas shoppers. She remarked, “What chaos.” And then she stopped and looked down at me. “Do you know how to spell ‘chaos’?” I gave it my best and began with, “k-a-y ...” But Mom came to the rescue and spelled the word out. “It’s a tough one,” she admitted. “But now you know something you didn’t know before.”

My father was part of the conspiracy to burnish my spelling chops. Once, while replacing a fuse in the basement as I looked on (I think I was 10), he referred to the electricity meter. “Spell ‘gauge,’” he prompted. Again, I struggled with the word until Dad took mercy on me. A couple of days later, out of the blue, he again asked me to spell the word, and I’m happy to say I nailed it. 

Why We Wrote This

In an era of instant gratification and fleeting pleasures, it’s easy to overlook the simple satisfaction that can be found in mastering foundational skills.

Ever since, I have loved to spell. Whenever I hear an unfamiliar word, even before I know what it means, I find myself mentally spelling it out. Thus it was with the recently acquired “anfractuosity,” a word I read in a news magazine about a migrant trying to overcome bureaucratic obstacles. (“Anfractuosity” refers to the twists and turns in a system.) I admit that I got so tied up in its spelling that I lost the thread of the story.

The thing about spelling is that orthography seems to have become de-emphasized over the years. When I was in elementary school, many moons ago, spelling was promoted with the same vigor one might employ in driving a team of horses. Spelling tests, spelling bees, spelling round robins. Of course, having been conditioned to spell well early on, I rose to all of these challenges and luxuriated in them. My reputation as a good speller grew to the point where, in fourth grade, I was asked to try out for a regional spelling bee. I drilled relentlessly with another student, reviewing list after list of challenging words. In the end I washed out, because I misspelled “syzygy.” (Oh, the shame!) 

Why many in Ukraine oppose a ‘land for peace’ formula to end the war

I have since recovered. Nonetheless, being an aficionado of spelling is a lonely vigil in an age when it doesn’t seem to be that important to most folks. Even at the university where I teach, the English department has a newly established policy of not correcting students’ spelling. The philosophy, I presume, is that it will stifle the students’ creativity. There also seems to be an undercurrent of belief that English spelling is just too hard.

I don’t know about the stifling part, but asserting that English spelling is difficult strikes me as a red herring. There are languages infinitely more complicated than English, and their speakers nevertheless learn to spell their vocabularies. I smile when I consider a word I learned in my college German class, referring to a chemical reaction: Reaktionsgeschwindigkeitsbestimmenderteil.

And then there’s the Polish word for violin, imparted to me by my grandmother: skrzypce.

How on earth did I learn to spell these words or even remember them? The answer: practice, impelled by a sense that, at some level, it mattered.

But I don’t need academic rationales to enjoy the practice of good spelling. I don’t value it because I feel I’m saving civilization, and I don’t pretend to be a model for others. The truth is that it gives me pleasure. P-l-e-a-s-u-r-e.  

Howard University hoped to make history. Now it’s ready for a different role.

And I have never forgotten how to spell “syzygy.”