Prosecutors say Oath Keepers planned 'armed rebellion' against US

The most significant Jan. 6 trial yet is now underway in federal court, as the leader of the Oath Keepers group and four associates stand accused of “seditious conspiracy.” Prosecutors are arguing that the five intended to “shatter a bedrock of American democracy.”

First Look

The founder of the Oath Keepers extremist group and four associates planned an “armed rebellion” to keep President Donald Trump in power, a federal prosecutor contended Monday as the most serious case yet went to trial in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Stewart Rhodes and his band of extremists were prepared to go to war to stop Joe Biden from becoming president, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler told jurors. The group celebrated the Capitol attack as a victory in that fight and continued their plot even after Mr. Biden’s electoral victory was certified, Mr. Nestler alleged.

“Their goal was to stop, by whatever means necessary, the lawful transfer of presidential power, including by taking up arms against the United States government,” the prosecutor said during his opening statement. “They concocted a plan for armed rebellion to shatter a bedrock of American democracy.”

The defendants are the first among hundreds of people arrested in the Capitol riot to stand trial on seditious conspiracy, a rare Civil War-era charge that calls for up to 20 years behind bars. The stakes are high for the Justice Department, which last secured such a conviction at trial nearly 30 years ago, and intends to try two more groups on the charge later this year.

The trial comes as Mr. Trump continues to insist, against much evidence, that the 2020 election was stolen from him, and as vocal pushback against the charges filed against those who entered the Capitol continues in some quarters. The broader reaction could show how the American public, as well as the jury, sees the attack, nearly two years later.

Defense attorneys accused prosecutors of cherry-picking comments from messages and videos and said the government has no evidence there ever was any plan to attack the Capitol. Mr. Rhodes’ attorney said his client will take the stand and show that the Oath Keepers had merely been preparing for orders they expected from Mr. Trump but never came.

“Stewart Rhodes meant no harm to the Capitol that day. Stewart Rhodes did not have any violent intent that day,” Mr. Rhodes’ attorney, Phillip Linder, said. “The story the government is trying to tell you today is completely wrong.”

On trial with Mr. Rhodes, of Granbury, Texas, are Kelly Meggs, leader of the Florida chapter of the Oath Keepers; Kenneth Harrelson, another Florida Oath Keeper; Thomas Caldwell, a retired U.S. Navy intelligence officer from Virginia, and Jessica Watkins, who led an Ohio militia group. They face several other charges as well.

They are among roughly 900 people who have been charged in the attack, which temporarily halted the certification of Mr. Biden’s victory, sent lawmakers running for cover, and left dozens of police officers injured.

In the Oath Keepers case, prosecutors will try to prove that their actions were not a spontaneous outpouring of election-fueled rage but part of a detailed, drawn-out plot to stop Mr. Biden from entering the White House.

The Oath Keepers “were prepared in November, they were prepared in December and when the opportunity finally presented itself on Jan 6, 2021, they sprang into action,” Mr. Nestler said.

Mr. Rhodes began plotting to overturn Mr. Biden’s victory right after the election, Mr. Nestler said. In November 2020, Mr. Rhodes sent his followers a step-by-step plan for stopping the transfer of power based on a popular uprising that brought down Yugoslavia’s president two decades earlier.

Around the same time, Mr. Rhodes was also communicating in another internet group – which included Trump ally Roger Stone – that was called “FOS,” or “Friends of Stone,” according to testimony. On Nov. 7, 2020, Mr. Rhodes said in a message to that group that he was on his way to D.C. for a possible “op” and was available to meet “face-to-face.”

As December approached, Mr. Rhodes’ rhetoric became increasingly violent and desperate, Mr. Nestler said.

In messages and comments read to the jury, the Oath Keepers repeatedly warned of violence if Mr. Biden were to become president. During a December interview, Mr. Rhodes called senators “traitors” and warned that the Oath Keepers would have to “overthrow, abort, or abolish Congress.” He described Jan. 6 as a “hard constitutional deadline” for stopping the transfer of power.

The Oath Keepers organized training, including one session on “unconventional warfare.” Before coming to Washington, they stashed “weapons of war” at a Virginia hotel to serve as “quick reaction force” that could get guns into the capital quickly if necessary, the prosecutor said.

As Oath Keepers stormed the Capitol in helmets and other battle gear, Mr. Rhodes remained on the outside, like “a general surveying his troops on a battlefield,” Mr. Nestler said. After the attack, the elated Oath Keepers went to a Virginia restaurant to celebrate their victory, the prosecutor said.

In the days between the riot and Mr. Biden’s inauguration, Mr. Rhodes spent more than $17,000 on firearm parts, ammunition, and other items, prosecutors say. Shortly after the insurrection, Mr. Rhodes was secretly recorded saying that his “only regret is that they should have brought rifles,” Mr. Nestler said.

Among those who may testify during the trial, which will last several weeks, are three Oath Keepers who’ve pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy and are cooperating with prosecutors in hopes of getting lighter sentences. They include a man who says that after arriving in Washington, Mr. Meggs told him that another Florida Oath Keeper had brought explosives in his RV.

The government’s first witness was an FBI agent, who responded on Jan. 6 to help rescue senators. He described lawmakers crying, broken doors and windows, and a scene that “looked like a bomb had gone off.”

Defense lawyers say prosecutors have ripped the Oath Keepers’ messages out of context to paint them unfairly. The Oath Keepers came to Washington to provide security at events for figures such as Mr. Stone before the president’s big outdoor rally behind the White House, defense lawyers said. Mr. Rhodes’ attorney described the group as a “peacekeeping” force and called his client an “extremely patriotic” man who “loves this country.”

Mr. Rhodes’ attorneys plan to argue that Mr. Rhodes believed Mr. Trump was going to invoke the Insurrection Act and call up a militia, which Mr. Rhodes had been calling on him to do to stop Mr. Biden from becoming president. Mr. Rhodes’ lawyers have said he was merely lobbying the president to invoke a U.S. law.

Prosecutors say it’s clear the Oath Keepers were going to act regardless of what Mr. Trump did. Mr. Nestler told jurors that Mr. Rhodes, a Yale Law School graduate, was only using the Insurrection Act as “legal cover.” In one message, Mr. Rhodes wrote in December 2020 that Mr. Trump “needs to know that if he fails to act, then we will.”

An attorney for Mr. Caldwell said his client is a disabled veteran who didn’t even know of the Oath Keepers until November 2020. The defense lawyer, David Fischer, called Jan. 6 a “black eye” for the country, but said Mr. Caldwell merely came to Washington “on a date with his wife” and wasn’t even planning to go to the Capitol until Mr. Trump’s speech on the Ellipse before the riot.

“Mr. Caldwell couldn’t storm his way out of a paper bag,” Mr. Fischer said. “I came here to clear his name.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press.