Honduras presidential vote: What if 'None of the Above' wins?

Xiomara Castro, wife of former President Zelaya, may lead in three polls, but 'None of the Above' is gaining ground. This voter disenchantment could present a real governing challenge.

August 30, 2013

• A version of this post ran on the author's blog. The views expressed are the author's own.

 We are not Nate Silver.
 
And the Honduran election isn't producing the wealth of polls Silver had available for the US Presidential election.
 
 But since we are going to continue to cover Honduran presidential polls, we think we should contextualize the few available as much as possible so readers can think about what is going on with something more than the prejudices Honduran candidates, and some Honduran commentators, are bringing to bear to "interpret" polling data.
 
Consider this graph of support for the major candidates in all the polls we have seen since the first appeared in January (there are some smaller parties polling less than 1 percent but except for rhetorical interest, they clearly are out of the running).

Xiomara Castro of the Libre Party started the year in the lead over the other three major candidates, and has maintained a lead in each poll since, regardless of differences in the absolute numbers reported. That's the first take-away point.
 
If you look at the two CID Gallup polls, between January and May, they found Castro and Salvador Nasralla increasing their share of support, while Juan Orlando Hernandez and Mauricio Villeda – representing the two traditional parties – lost supporters. That's the second point: the 2009 coup has indeed changed the political landscape.
 
And there is one more important point to understand about the polling.
 
The CID Gallup poll from May stands out, with Mr. Nasralla leading Mr. Hernandez. Then in the latest Paradigma poll, three of the four leading candidates appear to decline sharply in support.
 
Either May to July was a politically volatile period, or the CID Gallup poll from May is not like the other polls.
 
There is at least one obvious difference: Paradigma reports two additional categories: No response, and none of the candidates. So does Harris/Le Vote.

Tracing fentanyl’s path into the US starts at this port. It doesn’t end there.

CID Gallup only provides numbers for no response. Its no response category is reported to be about the same as that of the Paradigma and Harris/Le Vote polls (ranging from about 13 percent to 20 percent in the different polls).
 
CID Gallup is essentially making people choose between the declared candidates, or decline to respond-- but not giving them the option that the other polls have, to say they do not like anyone in the field.

Does that matter?

Take a look at the data over time from Paradigma (see original post).

Who's in the lead? None of the Above.

And None of the Above is gaining ground steadily: from 19 percent in February to 26 percent in April and over 30 percent in July.

The Harris/Le Vote poll for April reported almost the same level of respondents who supported none of the existing candidates: 22 percent.

Our advice? compare polls from the same pollsters, not across different pollsters. Pay more attention to the trends than the absolute numbers, since different pollsters may be producing apparently greater levels of support because what they are measuring is different.

And watch out for None of the Above. While she can't be inaugurated president, whoever does end up being sworn in will face a real governing challenge with almost a third of the electorate so disconnected from the options offered.

– Rosemary Joyce, an anthropologist with more than thirty years research experience in Honduras, co-authors the blog Honduras Culture and Politics, which tracks the complexities of Honduran social life after the 2009 coup.