Keeping an eye on China? First US Marines arrive in Australia.

The US is sending 2,500 Marines to Australia – officially to train with troops there and assist in humanitarian efforts. But many experts and diplomats say the real focus is China.

|
Chris Dickson/Australian Department of Defense/AP
Marine Corps personnel stand at attention with the 5th Battalion Royal Australian Regiment during an official welcome ceremony at Robertson Barracks in Darwin, Australia, Wednesday.

A contingent of some 200 US Marines have landed in northern Australia, part of a broader strategic shift by the US military toward the Pacific.

 That force size is expected to grow to 2,500 total US troops in the months to come.

The move has been widely interpreted as a signal to China, with its rising military force helmed by commanders who are often less-than-transparent in their intentions, Pentagon officials often complain.

Yet military officials stress that the focus of the US troops will first and foremost be on goals that don’t involve China. “There are two big thrusts here. One is obviously training with Australian defense forces and strengthening our already strong alliance with them,” says Capt. Greg Wolf, a US Marine Corps spokesman. 

The other is to deploy throughout the region to participate in theater exercises “and further regional security in that part of the world,” Captain Wolf adds. 

The Marines will also be on hand to respond to humanitarian disasters, such as the tsunami that swept through southeast Asia and last year’s earthquake in Japan

Australian officials have been slightly more provocative regarding the US troop arrival. “The world needs to essentially come to grips with the rise of China, the rise of India, the move of strategic and political and economic influence to our part of the world,” Australian Defense Minister Stephen Smith said as he greeted the charter flight carrying the company of US Marines.

“We see this very much as responding and reflecting the fact that the world is moving into our part of the world, the world is moving to the Asia Pacific and the Indian Ocean. We need to respond to that,” he added. 

The American ambassador to Australia, however, pushed back against the notion that the Pentagon’s troop influx into the region is primarily aimed at containing China. “There’s this kind of sexy, fun narrative that you hear from pundits and others trying to suggest this is about China,” said US ambassador Jeffrey Bleich, “but it’s not.” 

Pentagon officials have made no secret about their concerns involving China, though. Adm. Samuel Locklear III, who heads US Pacific Command, for his part describes the US military’s relationship with China as “cooperative, but competitive.” 

“We’re an Asian power,” Admiral Locklear said of the United States in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February. “We have interest in that part of the world. And I believe that the Chinese and other people in that part of the world need to recognize that we do have US national security interests there.”

Locklear, along with other US military officials, has called for expanded cooperation between the American and Chinese militaries, which could help reduce any tensions that could potentially lead to conflict. “Greater transparency is good for all of us to avoid miscalculation,” he said.

As the new Pacific Command head, Locklear told lawmakers that his “plan” will be to “improve our ‘mil-to-mil’ relationships – with a recognition that there are things we won’t agree on.” 

There are currently some 320,000 US troops in the Pacific region.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Keeping an eye on China? First US Marines arrive in Australia.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2012/0404/Keeping-an-eye-on-China-First-US-Marines-arrive-in-Australia
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe