The NBA finals a bit dizzying; and so is Stengel's linguistic legacy

Has anybody really made heads or tails of pro basketball's current championship series? Without question, it is one of the hardest to sort out in years. Boston now holds a 3-games-to-2 edge in the best-of-7 final, but Houston has already given the Celtics more than they bargained for and could even the series by winning tonight's sixth game in Texas.

If that happens, the teams shuttle back to Boston for the season-ender Sunday afternoon.

Motivation may have been a problem for the Celtics earlier in the series, but it shouldn't be now. Houston ended a 14-game Boston winning streak over the Rockets in Game 2, when Moses Malone & Co. set a National Basketball Association playoff record with their eighth victory on the road.

Playoff basketball just naturally heats up the further into a series two teams go. "You're playing the same guys every time and the personal rivalries get going," says Boston forward Kevin McHale. "Ordinarily you wouldn't see the same opponent for two weeks or so and you forget about any imagined or real problems.

Fanning the flames in the current series have been Malone's verbal put-downs of the Celtics. The bullish Rocket center said the Celtics just aren't that good. He still feels Boston is so-so, even after Houston's embarrassing 109-80 loss Tuesday night. The Rockets also scored a season-low 71 points during a 23 -point defeat in Game 3.

If Boston should go on to win its 14th NBA crown, spindly Cedric Maxwell would appear to have the inside track on the MVP award. The longest-standing member of the current Celtics, with four years in Boston, "Max" has taken up the scoring slack since Larry Bird fell into a sudden shooting slump. Besides scoring 52 points in the last two games, mostly by squeezing up shots through the tangle of bodies near the basket, he has begun playing the inspirational leader role so needed down the stretch.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to The NBA finals a bit dizzying; and so is Stengel's linguistic legacy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1981/0514/051431.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us