Rights switch

By taking the unusual step of dismissing the head of the US Commission on Civil Rights, President Reagan challenges himself to show whether he means this to be a step forward or backward on civil rights.

The displaced man, Arthur S. Flemming, leaves with warnings about the Reagan administration's ''lip service'' toward equal opportunity. The new man, Clarence Pendleton, arrives with a reputation for opposing the tools of affirmative action and busing to achieve equal opportunity in jobs and schools.

The question is whether Mr. Reagan, who also opposes these tools, will find other means to ensure that America's progress in civil rights is not set back - and whether Mr. Pendleton will fortify the commission's independent and bipartisan role in monitoring and promoting this progress.

After his appointment Mr. Pendleton spoke as if he could accept court-ordered busing for desegregation and affirmative action for those who ''need'' it. But by and large the switch at the commission appears to fit with a number of administration signals reducing federal vigor in support of civil rights. The President must not allow that impression to stand unless he wants the charge of ''lip service'' to stick.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Rights switch
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1981/1119/111911.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us