Inside Report (3)

Pro-life forces are divided and-disgruntled about how best to ban legal abortions.

Some groups are hailing a Constitutional amendment put forward by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah. Others bitterly oppose it; they prefer the ''human life bill'' offered by Sen. Jesse Helms (R) of North Carolina.

The matter now rests in the Judiciary Committee, on which Hatch serves. The committee still has not picked between the two and has delayed consideration until early next month. Hatch has cast doubts on the constitutionality of the Helms bill, but many pro-lifers think the Hatch amendment is a sure loser. The amendment would require a two-thirds vote in both Houses; the bill needs only a majority.

The dispute is postponing the long-delayed floor debate over abortion, and the delay suits many lawmakers just fine. They have no taste for a divisive fight over abortion in an election year.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Inside Report (3)
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0226/022609.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us