The O'Connor dissent

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor got to the heart of the matter this week in another example of the independent judgment marking her first term. It came in her dissent from the Supreme Court's decision to let the FBI withhold file summaries requested by a journalist under the Freedom of Information Act.

A lower court had ruled that the summaries, prepared for political purposes under the Nixon administration, did not qualify for a statutory exemption. The Supreme Court majority interpreted the exemption more broadly and overturned the lower ruling. Mrs. O'Connor read the law to require narrow construction and the judicial interpretation ''most favoring disclosure'' - as a public concerned about freedom of information would hope. Even if it were possible to ''concoct genuine doubts'' about this particular exemption, she said, those doubts would have to be resolved in favor of disclosure. Hear, hear.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to The O'Connor dissent
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0526/052612.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us