Restraint is the key in arms sales

In the front-page article "US Arms Makers Still Push Sales," March 31, representatives of the US weapons industry argue that selling their wares to developing countries is beneficial to the American economy. If we don't do it, they say, someone else will, so we might as well be the ones to benefit. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Developing nations spend $200 billion annually on military forces, a figure greater than their foreign aid and their debt repayments combined. This is a tremendous drain on their economic growth and, as a result, their potential to buy US exports. Military forces also retard growth by spurring conflicts that spread refugees throughout entire regions, as well as by exercising political power and slowing the transition to democracy and long-term stability.

Our response to other nations' attempts to sell more weapons should be to press vigorously for multilateral restraints on all arms sales, similar to those we have fashioned for chemical weapons and sophisticated missiles - not to throw up our hands and take part in a short-term plunder that is costly to everyone except the arms industry. Caleb Rossiter, Washington, Director, Project on Demilitarization and Democracy

Letters are welcome. Only a selection can be published, subject to condensation, and none acknowledged. Please address them to "Readers Write," One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115.