The Social Security Debate Is Not a Debate of Childen vs. Retirees

As a retired schoolteacher I remain concerned about children. However, after three years of retirement, I am watching the poverty level moving upward with inflation toward our retirement income. Didn't I pay into Social Security and is it not self-supporting? Why are we portrayed as fat cats who are cutting into children's resources? My wife and I give, as best we can, to children's causes by teaching Sunday school, volunteering, substitute teaching, and donating money and resalable items to organization s that help children. J. C. Fidler, El Centro, Calif.

Letters are welcome. Only a selection can be published, subject to condensation, and none acknowledged. Please fax letters to (617) 450-2317 or address them to "Readers Write," One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to The Social Security Debate Is Not a Debate of Childen vs. Retirees
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1993/0407/letter2.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us