Leading Foe Of NAFTA Says It May Pass

DESPITE his opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement, Rep. Richard Gephardt (D) of Missouri, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, says NAFTA could still pass.

In a Monitor breakfast yesterday, Representative Gephardt played down the impact of his announcement Tuesday that he would oppose NAFTA - even though, as a member of the House leadership, Gephardt would normally be a key lobbyist for the president's position.

``I truly believe that there's a tremendous exaggeration about what anybody brings to this in terms of influencing other votes,'' Gephardt said. ``Many of the members have been dealing with this issue for a long time. The new members dealt with it in the election. And many of the members a long time ago reached an opinion.''

He adds that 2 1/2 years ago, Congress voted by a modest majority to put negotiation of NAFTA on a ``fast track'' - further indication, presumably, that those members who are still in Congress have given the matter serious thought.

However, many could wind up where Gephardt did: voting for the fast track, but opposing the treaty as it has developed, with side agreements negotiated by the Clinton administration to bolster the Bush-era treaty.

If enacted, NAFTA would eliminate trade barriers among the United States, Mexico, and Canada over the next 10 years. Gephardt finds two major deficiencies with the plan.

First, he says, there is not a ``level playing field'' in the way wages and work conditions are set. Even though Mexico has laws on the books guaranteeing the right to strike and bargain collectively, in practice the government sets wages and prohibits real labor unions.

His second objection centers on the training of US workers who will lose their jobs, for whom there is not a major source of assistance. Gephardt wants a ``cross-border transaction fee'' because there's no money in the budget for this.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Leading Foe Of NAFTA Says It May Pass
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1993/0924/24072.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us