Giving up Luxuries to Feed Hungry Children

Regarding the article "Pampered Pets, Hungry Children - Which Come First?" Oct. 19: I agree with the author that a prosperous nation such as the United States should be able to find the resources to feed undernourished children. But taking away our companion animals' nourishment is not the answer.

When I adopted my cat a year ago, I made a commitment to provide quality food for her that will keep her healthy. Most pet foods contain pesticides and artificial colors. So I don't consider the all-natural cat food from my local health food store a "luxury."

This isn't to say I can't afford to help children too. We all can. For example, I can make do with one movie, instead of three or four, from the video store on weekends. Instead of buying the latest best-selling book, I can borrow it from the local library.

If Americans gave up even one or two true "luxuries" each week and donated the money they saved to charities, I think we'd find that there are enough resources to feed both children and animals.

Maggie Moore

Rockville, Md.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Giving up Luxuries to Feed Hungry Children
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/1995/1106/06205.html
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us