12 really good new sports books

Here's a grab bag of a dozen new sports books.

5. ‘Football’s Game Changers: Icons, Record Breakers, Scandals, Super Bowls, and More,’ by Barry Wilner and Ken Rappoport

If you had to pick the single most influential factor that changed the sport of football and ultimately led to it’s becoming the most popular sport in America, what would it be? Television? The Super Bowl? Or perhaps instant replay. All are near the top of the 50 game-changing developments ranked by Barry Wilner and Ken Rappoport, a couple of longtime sportswriters and football observers, who may surprise you with their No. 1 pick: the White House. Or more to the point, President Theodore Roosevelt, who demanded that football reduce its level of violence or risk being abolished. Fans of the game surely will be curious to see where and why the authors of “Football Game Changers” rate Vince Lombardi, integration, fantasy leagues, the West Coast Offense, and Joe Namath. 

Here’s an excerpt from Football’s Game Changers:

“In 1895 [Auburn coach John] Heisman was scouting a game between Georgia and North Carolina when something unusual happened. North Carolina’s punter was about to be swamped. He didn’t have time to kick the ball, so he threw it to get rid of it as quickly as possible. A teammate caught it and in the confusion ran 70 yards. Touchdown! The only one of the game. The Georgia coach yelled in protest. The rattled referee turned a blind eye to this new development and claimed not to have seen the ball thrown.

“It made an impression on Heisman. Why not legalize the forward pass? The Rules Committee chair was Walter Camp, so Heisman turned to him. The answer was an emphatic no!

“Every year Heisman presented his case, and the answer was always the same.

“Finally 11 years later in 1906, with an ultimatum from President Theodore Roosevelt to clean up the violence in the game, the forward pass was legalized. The NCAA accepted Heisman’s argument that passing would open up the game, and spread out contact on the field, thus cutting down on injuries.”

5 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.