Two Serious Ladies

Jane Bowles's radical fiction was as defiantly unconventional as its author.

Two Serious Ladies, by Jane Bowles, HarperCollins, 240 pp.

In the 13th century, Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II looked around him and saw a land of many tongues and many dialects. But which, if any, was the pure language of God? Perhaps it was something innate, lost in the course of growing up human. In order to discover the inborn language, he had a group of infants isolated from language at birth: The children's nurses were instructed to care for the infants but never to speak to them, so that when they began to speak their voices would be unsullied by human intervention, by any mundane dilution, and from their lips would spring the language with which we are naturally bestowed, the language of the heavens, be it Hebrew, Latin, or Arabic. 

I was thinking of Frederick II when I was reading Jane Bowles's Two Serious Ladies, wondering if she was the result of a similar experiment. Perhaps a literary critic wanted to discover how a writer deprived of novels, storybooks, even good anecdotes would go about telling a story. Because Bowles does not break the rules of how to structure a novel; she writes as if she had no idea such rules ever existed.

The results of the second experiment were more fruitful than the first (a bunch of dead babies.) But it really makes for a curious act of reading. No one, apparently, ever told Jane Bowles that it would confuse a reader if you spent the first quarter of the book following one character, only to abruptly drop her to follow a woman we briefly met at a cocktail party many pages back without any transition whatsoever. No one, apparently, ever told Jane Bowles that the actions of her characters need to make some sort of logical sense, even if that logic is entirely subjective. Likewise she seems entirely ignorant about things like character development and five-act structures and resolution. And thank god for all of that, because the result is strangely beautiful, like an elegant and venomous insect.

The form reflects the content, then, because the novel is about the effects of deprivation of another kind: social. Our lonely selves might be our purer selves, unshaped by society's expectations and normalizing effect, but our purer selves sure are strange. The first of Bowles's eponymous ladies is Christina Goering, the product of a lonely childhood, spent friendless but in a state of religious exaltation. No wonder she could not find anyone to play with her. "[The game's] called 'I forgive you for all your sins'... You'll have to take your dress off." Christina is remarkably lifelike, the child whose only friend was God. She grows into an ascetic eccentric with a bit of Messiah complex and her house begins to fill with followers, as Messiahs rarely seem to have trouble attracting them.

Her titular companion is Mrs. Frieda Copperfield, who follows her husband on vacation into Panama, only to break away from him to befriend prostitutes and sleep with all comers. Frieda is perhaps Christina's opposite, socialized into normalcy but crammed into a marriage with a man who had no interest in seeing her or hearing her. It seems he only got married so that he would have someone to explain things to, and Frieda went along with it until she did not. She is the dutiful wife, but then she finds herself in the sweaty embrace of a large female prostitute and her true self, kept for so long underground and under pressure, erupts to the surface as fully formed and pure as a cut diamond.

The plot is not the point, nor really the prose, it's the experience of the thing. "Oh my – oh my," says Mrs. Quill, speaking for us all, "must I always be told what other people do? I've had just about enough of it."  The best way to describe this book might be queer. Certainly it's written by a gay woman who married a gay man and lived as an expatriate in Tangier in the 1940s, but my definition does not stop there. I also mean by "queer" all of those inappropriate, singular weirdnesses that got smashed out of us in elementary school, anything that stood out as too angular and too bizarre and so made us a target. We shed most of that stuff, so desperate we were not to stand out. Jane Bowles and her strange ladies had the strength to retain it. The result is a reminder of the divinity of the inappropriate, which we so willingly relinquish in the name of being understood. Or at least understandable.

"Two Serious Ladies" was Jane Bowles's only novel, but then Frederick's babies only got a few clicks and howls out before giving up entirely, too. "I have gone to pieces, which is a thing I've wanted to do for years," says Mrs. Copperfield at the end of the book. We all go to pieces sometimes, it's true. But then only a few of us have the strength to decide not to put ourselves back together.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Two Serious Ladies
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2014/0306/Two-Serious-Ladies
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe