Five ways big banks' Libor scandal affects you

4. As a bank customer

Olivia Harris/Reuters/File
Police wait for protestors to appear at a branch of Barclays Bank in Westminster, central London, in early July after the bank's chief executive Bob Diamond quit over the interest rate-rigging scandal. Barclays was the first of the big banks to pay a $450 million fine in connection with the scandal, raising pressures to pass on the costs to customers.

This cuts both ways. During the last few years, any outsized profits from rate manipulation may have lessened pressure on the banks to raise customer fees. Now, however, the bill for wrongdoing is coming due. On June 27, 2012, London's Barclay's bank was the first bank to confess to misconduct. Between 2005 and 2009, the bank manipulated Libor submissions to give a healthier picture of the bank's credit quality and its ability to raise funds. It reached an agreement with British and American regulators to pay a $450 million fine, and three top officials of the bank resigned. Adding to the outrage is the discovery that regulators in Britain and the United States may have known that Libor was being rigged as far back as the fall of 2007 but took limited action.

Libor investigations could cost banks billions of dollars in penalties. Sixteen banks are under investigation for manipulating the Libor or other rate indexes to get extra profits and limit losses on their trading positions. Such losses would dent profits, causing big banks to look elsewhere for revenue. This could affect fees and rates that banks charge their customers.

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.