Super Bowl XLVIII: Four surprising facts and figures

Every year in February, Americans revisit their Roman numerals to figure out what edition of the Super Bowl it is. (FYI, Super Bowl XLVIII = Super Bowl 48.) But there are some other numbers surrounding the big game that you might not know about. With just days to go before the nation’s biggest sporting event, NerdWallet takes a look at some Super Bowl numbers that may surprise you, from salary figures for the Broncos and Seahawks, to the shocking markup in hotel rooms during the big game.

Jeff Roberson/AP
Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson listens to a question during a news conference Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014, in Jersey City, N.J. Wilson makes 3 percent of the salary of Peyton Manning, his rival quarterback for Super Bowl XLVIII.

1. $132.8 million and $133.8 million

Jeff Roberson/AP
Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson listens to a question during a news conference Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014, in Jersey City, N.J. Wilson makes just 3 percent of the salary of Denver Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning, his rival quarterback in Super Bowl XLVIII

What: the combined salaries of the Denver Broncos and the Seattle Seahawks, respectively.

NFL teams operate under a league-wide hard salary cap—in other words, the NFL imposes a total salary figure that all 32 of its teams must operate under. This year’s Super Bowl features teams with two of the top three cap figures in the league (the highest belongs to the Kansas City Chiefs).

On Sunday, the Denver Broncos and their top-ranked offense will take on the Seattle Seahawks and their top-ranked defense. You might assume that each team’s salary distribution correlates with its on-field strengths and weaknesses. However, that’s not necessarily the case.

According to spotrac.com’s salary data, the 2013 Denver Broncos had a payroll that resulted in a total adjusted cap figure of $132,835,029. Of that total, 53 percent was spent on offensive players, the highest-paid of whom is none other than star quarterback Peyton Manning. The Broncos’ second-highest-paid player is Champ Bailey, a defensive player and one of the best cornerbacks of his generation.

A look at Seattle’s salary distribution shows, perhaps surprisingly, that they allocate more of their payroll for offense than Denver does. Of their $133,800,532 total cap figure, 57 percent has been spent on offense, while 41 percent went into forming their vaunted defense. Interestingly, One of Seattle’s highest-paid players is wide receiver Sidney Rice, who won’t even be playing in the Super Bowl as he’s recovering from an ACL tear suffered in October.

Seattle’s starting quarterback is Russell Wilson, who in his second season makes just 3.5 percent of Manning’s base salary: $526,217 vs. $15,000,000. And cornerback Richard Sherman, the hottest name in the sports stratosphere these days, has a base salary of $555,000, which is 5.8 percent of Bailey’s salary.

On average, offensive players in the NFL almost always make more money than defensive players, especially quarterbacks and offensive linemen (i.e., the ones protecting the quarterback). While Denver pays its quarterback a significant amount more than Seattle does its passer, the Seahawks can complement Wilson with running backs, receivers and tight ends who are paid more than Manning’s offensive counterparts. The Seahawks also boast a younger defense—indeed, the entire team is the second-youngest in Super Bowl history—than the Broncos, and key players such as Sherman and Earl Thomas are still on their rookie contracts and are yet to receive their big paydays.

1 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.