Clippers for sale? Six potential celebrity buyers.

As the NBA begins the likely messy process of forcing Donald Sterling to sell his team after giving him a lifetime league ban and a $2.5 million fine, a big question looms:  If the NBA and its owners can get Sterling to sell, who will be the new Clippers owner? Several famous names have already thrown their hats into the ring, including sports superstars, titans of entertainment and business, and a former child actor. 

3. Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Oscar De La Hoya

Danny Moloshok/Reuters/File
US boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr.,sits courtside with Donald Sterling (r.) and Sterling's wife Shelly (2nd r.) at a basketball game between the Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Clippers in Los Angeles in 2011.

Job: Professional boxers (De La Hoya is retired)

Net Worth: $170 million and $200 million, respectively.

What would make them good owners? De La Hoya already has experience with sports ownership, as one of the principal owners of the Major League Soccer franchise the Houston Dynamo, and he is the majority owner of a sports licensing company. Like Johnson, both he and Mayweather would be part of an ownership group. “Me and my team want to buy the Clippers. And we can afford the Clippers," Mayweather told Las Vegas reporters April 29.

"When it comes to business, what better than two minorities? The commissioner wanted to see more minority ownership in the NBA," De La Hoya told USA Today. "If he wants more minorities involved in the NBA, what better than me and Floyd to be part of a potential ownership group?”

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.