Volkswagen gets brief legal reprieve, but deadlines loom

Volkswagen was given an extra month to reach an agreement with regulators over nearly 600,000 vehicles affected by an emissions scandal. 

|
AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, File
The VW sign of Germany's Volkswagen car company is displayed at the building of a company's retailer in Berlin (Oct. 5, 2015).

On Thursday, a US District Court judge gave Volkswagen an extra month to work with regulators to find an appropriate solution to the hundreds of thousands of American cars implicated in a scandal over falsified diesel emissions tests. The German carmaker now has until April 21 to find a solution that the federal government finds satisfactory or face trial.

At a hearing in San Francisco, Judge Charles Beyer, representatives from Volkswagen, and US regulators agreed that progress has been made in negotiations, but that more time will be required to reach an agreement.

"We're working around the clock" Volkswagen attorney Elizabeth Cabraser told Reuters as she left the briefing. "I'll sleep when they're fixed."

In September 2015, Volkswagen executives admitted to installing “defeat devices” in diesel Volkswagen and Audi car models manufactured as far back as 2009. The devices detect when the car is undergoing emissions testing and temporarily activate strict emissions controls. The device then turns the emission controls off during normal driving, effectively deceiving regulators and emitting far more pollution into the atmosphere than reported.

The company now faces a range of civil lawsuits as well as a colossal $46 billion Justice Department suit. Nearly 600,000 cars in America are estimated to have the defeat devices installed. Volkswagen originally was tasked with providing a fix for the cars by March 24.

Judge Breyer said April 21 was a firm deadline for "a concrete and detailed proposal for getting the polluting cars fixed or off the road," according to Reuters.

If no proposal is made, the lawsuit would continue and the courts would decide what steps Volkswagen is required to take and how much compensation they would provide buyers of the affected vehicles.

One possible hold up for an agreement between federal regulators and Volkswagen is that the diesel models could be impossible to bring up to current legal emission levels.

Former vice chairman of General Motors and longtime Volkswagen competitor Bob Lutz told the New York Times that his company's attempts to match Volkswagen's diesel-engine efficiency were in vain. Now he knows why.

“There’s no way to fix these noncompliant cars,” Mr. Lutz told the New York Times.

If that’s the case, it is unclear if US regulatory agencies would allow a partial fix that would at least improve the emission levels of the vehicles, but not bring them up to legal standards. If not, the company may have to buy the vehicles back at above market value, according to the Times, adding to what could already be an extraordinary financial burden.

“Using a defeat device in cars to evade clean air standards is illegal and a threat to public health,” said Cynthia Giles, an EPA official, in September. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Volkswagen gets brief legal reprieve, but deadlines loom
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/0325/Volkswagen-gets-brief-legal-reprieve-but-deadlines-loom
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe