Would you buy a car from Google?

With rumors that Google would launch its own car company comes the news that Google is now speaking with with a range of manufacturers, in the hopes of building a car to its own specifications, Read writes.

|
Eric Risberg/AP/File
Google co-founder Sergey Brin gestures after riding in a driverless car with California Gov. Edmund G Brown Jr., left, and state Senator Alex Padilla, second from left, to a bill signing for driverless cars at Google headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., last September.

For years, we've reported on Google's development of self-driving cars -- or more accurately, on Google's development of self-driving car technology.

Until recently, many folks assumed that Google would only create the software for autonomous vehicles, then license that software to car companies, which would install the software on their own vehicles. That assumption was based on the lessons that Google seems to have learned through Android -- namely, that making hardware is a great way to lose money.

The end result of Google's efforts would be cars like the ones we've already seen, in which Google's autonomous vehicle technology has been installed on models like the Toyota Prius. Automakers around the world would be able to sell a "Google Package" (or whatever clever name they came up with) to eager autonomous car fans.

But that scenario may play out as expected. According to our colleagues at Motor Authority, Google is preparing to launch its very own car company.

Well, maybe.  

The news comes by way of Amir Efrati, writing at JessicaLessin.com. Efrati cites "people familiar with the matter", who say that Google has tried to work with major automakers to incorporate its autonomous technology, but those efforts haven't paid off.

As a result, Google is now speaking with with a range of manufacturers, in the hopes of building a car to its own specifications. This is in line with news reports that surfaced last week in which parts supplier Continental revealed that it has been working with Google and IBM to launch self-driving cars. Full details about that collaboration should be announced next month at the Frankfurt Auto Show.

THE NITTY, THE GRITTY

If Google does shift into the autonomous car business, the question remains: what's it going to do with those vehicles?

Is it going to sell directly to consumers? That's a possibility. Perhaps the company has been emboldened by the growing success of Tesla, which shows that tech-hungry Americans are eager for new transportation options. 

But will drivers really want to give up driving? According to Efrati, car companies are eager to offer autonomous safety features such as lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and even "road train" convoy technology, like the kind Volvo has been perfecting with its SARTRE system. But to relinquish complete control of the vehicle to a computer? Not so much.

Efrati thinks Google might have its eyes set on taxi service -- something that's been discussed quite a bit since Google scored its first autonomous car license plate in Nevada. And for good reason: motoring down scenic byways is one thing, but shuttling tipsy gamblers up and down the Las Vegas Strip? That seems like a prime target for automation.

Can Google go it alone? Will the mistakes it's learned from Android help it conquer the mainstream auto market? Or should Google focus on a particular niche of consumers, which ultimately helped Tesla gain traction among a broader group of shoppers? Sound off in the comments below. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Would you buy a car from Google?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2013/0826/Would-you-buy-a-car-from-Google
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe