Will cameras replace rearview mirrors on cars?

Passenger car manufacturers are hoping that a rule requiring rear-facing cameras on vehicles will eliminate the need for rearview mirrors.

|
The Car Connection
The Tesla Model X concept car, which lacks side mirrors. Automakers hope an upcoming requirement for rearview cameras will allow them to "use cameras as an option to the conventional side-view and rearview mirrors," according to an industry trade group.

In February 2008, Congress passed the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act, which was intended to make cars safer for kids.

Among other things, the new law required rearview cameras to be installed on all U.S. passenger vehicles, and it charged the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration with setting technical guidelines for those cameras and a timeline for their rollout. NHTSA was supposed to complete those tasks by 2011.

Three years behind schedule, 2011 is finally here: NHTSA has announced final specs and guidelines for rearview cameras, and by May 2018, the devices will be required on all vehicles weighing less than 10,000 pounds.

Consumer safety groups should be especially happy, because the new cameras could prevent hundreds of accidental deaths and thousands of injuries each year -- especially among children and the elderly. Per NHTSA: "On average, there are 210 fatalities and 15,000 injuries per year caused by backover crashes. NHTSA has found that children under 5 years old account for 31 percent of backover fatalities each year, and adults 70 years of age and older account for 26 percent."

The other group that's happy about the ruling? Automakers. Many already include rearview cameras on higher-end models, and now, they'll have standards to rely on when designing them. 

But more importantly, rearview cameras give automakers leverage to push for something that many have wanted for some time: the end of sideview mirrors.

If you've ever seen a concept car, chances are, it's had slim, completely impractical sideview mirrors. That's because most designers hate them. They're oddly shaped protuberances that gunk up otherwise sleek designs and increase drag, draining fuel economy. The folks at Tesla hate them so much, they haven't even bothered to include sideviews on the company's new Model X (see above).

Now that cameras have essentially supplanted rearview mirrors, some car companies are hoping that NHTSA will take the next step and toss both rearview and sideview mirrors in the dustbin of design history. Yesterday, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents a range of foreign and domestic automakers, issued the following statement in response to NHTSA's decision:

"Today, the Alliance is petitioning NHTSA to allow automakers to use cameras as an option to the conventional side-view and rearview mirrors. Today’s mirrors provide a robust and simple means to view the surrounding areas of a vehicle. Cameras will open opportunities for additional design flexibility and innovation. This idea has been in development since the 1990s, when the U.S. Department of Energy partnered with automakers to produce an energy-efficient concept car with cameras instead of side-view mirrors."

How will NHTSA respond? If the agency's work on rearview cameras is any indication, we'll know know in about six years.

For more on this story, check out our colleagues at Motor Authority.

___________________________________________

Follow The Car Connection on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will cameras replace rearview mirrors on cars?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2014/0402/Will-cameras-replace-rearview-mirrors-on-cars
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe