Skip to footer

The 10 most (and least) deadly cars in America

Traffic fatalities in the US have reached another record low, but when it comes to prevention, not all vehicle models are created equal. Which cars fared best? Worst? 

|
Lucas Jackson/Reuters/File
The Honda 2014 Odyssey minivan is displayed during the New York International Auto Show in New York. The Odyssey has one of the lowest fatality rates among US cars, according to a recent study from the IIHS

Every year, it seems like we report that traffic fatalities in America have reached another record low. Now, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has offered up more good news: your chance of dying behind the wheel of a late-model vehicle fell more than 40 percent in just three years.

Why? The IIHS identifies a number of changes that have improved the way that our cars protect us and altered the way that we operate our vehicles, including:

  • The requirement that all vehicles sold in the U.S. come with electronic stability control, which has dramatically reduced rollovers during collisions (especially among SUVs).
  • Stronger, safer vehicle structures
  • Increased availability of side airbags
  • Increased use of seat belts

In fact, IIHS used data gathered over the past 30 years to calculate the number of vehicle deaths that would've occurred in 2012 if safety improvements hadn't been instituted, leaving cars the same as they were in the mid-1980s. According to IIHS analysis, America would've seen about 7,700 more deaths that year than were actually recorded.

Even more exciting is the fact that the pace of improvement is ramping up. The IIHS says that "Among 2011 models, there were 28 driver deaths per million registered vehicle years* through the 2012 calendar year, down from 48 for 2008 models through 2009." That's a drop of nearly 42 percent.

However, the picture isn't entirely rosy. The IIHS believes that part of the reason for the current low fatality rate stems from the Great Recession, which put many Americans out of work. As the economy continues to improve, putting more drivers back on the road, analysts worry that rates could climb.

BEST & WORST PERFORMING VEHICLES

As part of its study, IIHS also looked closely at the makes and models involved in fatal accidents. (Note: as with some other studies, this one only looks at deaths of drivers, ignoring the fate of passengers.) A surprising nine vehicles from the 2011 model year saw no driver deaths at all. Perhaps less surprising is the fact that all nine of those models were large and midsize cars and SUVs.

LEAST FATALITIES
Vehicle / Number of deaths per million registered vehicle years

Audi A4 4WD / 0
Honda Odyssey / 0
Kia Sorento 2WD / 0
Lexus RX 350 4WD / 0
Mercedes-Benz GL-Class 4WD / 0
Subaru Legacy 4WD / 0
Toyota Highlander hybrid 4WD / 0
Toyota Sequoia 4WD / 0
Volvo XC90 4WD / 0
Honda Pilot 4WD / 2

At the other end of the scale -- the one with the highest fatality rates -- the IIHS found mostly small cars, though at least one large car and a pickup also saw an unusually high number of driver deaths. 

MOST FATALITIES
Vehicle / Number of deaths per million registered vehicle years

Kia Rio / 149
Nissan Versa / 130
Hyundai Accent / 120
Chevrolet Aveo / 99
Hyundai Accent / 86
Chevrolet Camaro / 80
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew 4WD / 79
Honda Civic / 76
Nissan Versa hatchback / 71
Ford Focus / 70

Want to see how your car measures up on the safety scale? Visit IIHS.org.

* In IIHS lingo, "A registered vehicle year is one vehicle registered for one year".

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to The 10 most (and least) deadly cars in America
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2015/0209/The-10-most-and-least-deadly-cars-in-America
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe