Honda, Kia, Nissan, Toyota called out for lack of women in leadership roles

A new website called LedBetter has compiled stats on 231 corporations and found that many of them have no women at all in executive positions or on their boards.

|
Paul Sancya/AP/File
In 2015 photo, Mary Barra, then General Motors chief executive officer, introduces the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze in Detroit.

In late 2013, General Motors announced that it was giving its top job to Mary Barra. It was very, very big news. Barra had plenty of fans, plenty of credentials, and as if that weren't enough to make her appointment noteworthy, Barra was the first woman to take the reins of a major automaker.

At other companies, however, women have had fewer successes--sometimes, far fewer. In fact, a brand new website called LedBetter has compiled stats on 231 international corporations, and it's found that many of them have no women at all in executive positions or on their boards of directors.

Why is that important? Today, it's generally agreed that diversity is beneficial for businesses. In fact, there's a good bit of data to suggest that the more diverse a company's workforce is, the more innovative, creative, and profitable the company becomes. And on a more fundamental level, at this point in our history, it seems appropriate that a company's employees mirror the diverse array of customers that a company attracts.

In the auto industry, which serves consumers across lines of race, gender, and sexuality, you might think that employees would represent a cross-section of the public. But in many cases, you'd be wrong. According to LedBetter, four automakers received failing marks on its gender equality test:

Honda: Of the 231 companies ranked by LedBetter, Honda clocks in at #220 in terms of gender diversity. A few women sit on the board of directors, though 93 percent of those spots are still held by men. And there are no women at all on Honda's executive leadership team--as in 0 percent.

Kia: Kia fared even worse than Honda. Kia has no women on the board or in executive positions, earning it a score of 0 and a bottom-of-the-barrel rank of #223. Kia's sibling, Hyundai, isn't rated by LedBetter, but after taking a quick look at its board of directors, we're not sure it would fare much better.

Nissan: Nissan shares Kia's score of 0 and ties its #223 ranking. The company has no women on its executive leadership team or on its board of directors. 

Toyota: Faring slightly worse than Honda but better than Kia and Nissan is Toyota, which lands at #221. Just 6 percent of its board positions are held by women, and Toyota has no women on its executive team.

Meanwhile, General Motors comes in at a very respectable #27, Harley-Davidson ranks #84, BMW lands at #117, Daimler/Mercedes-Benz arrives at #140, Ford slots in at #144, and Volkswagen at #183. LedBetter is still gathering data on others in the auto industry. Some, like Fiat Chrysler, will probably fare pretty well. Others, less so.

It's tempting to dwell on the fact that all four of LedBetter's lowest-ranked automakers are from Asia--and in fact, that may be more than coincidence. Japan and South Korea are often viewed as more socially conservative than America and Western Europe, which might explain why women are having a tougher time landing top-tier positions. At the moment, though, there's no data to explain the overlap, only raw numbers.

This article originally appeared on The Car Connection.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Honda, Kia, Nissan, Toyota called out for lack of women in leadership roles
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0618/Honda-Kia-Nissan-Toyota-called-out-for-lack-of-women-in-leadership-roles
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe