Volkswagen diesel modifications begin testing in California. Can faulty cars be fixed?

The California Air Resources Board is preparing to test hardware and software modifications for all three varieties of VW and Audi 2.0-liter TDI models affected by Volkswagen's diesel emission cheating fallout. 

|
Nick Ut/AP/File
A 2013 Volkswagen Passat with a diesel engine is evaluated at the California Air Resources Board emissions test lab in El Monte, Calif.

Under the settlement that got preliminary approval last week, Volkswagen must either buy back 466,000 2.0-liter TDI diesel cars or modify them to meet emissions standards.

But much skepticism persists among owners and in the media about whether VW can devise modifications that will satisfy regulators, and how long that process will take.

Ten months after the company's use of "defeat device" software was first revealed, it appears Volkswagen may be making some progress on that front.

The California Air Resources Board is preparing to test hardware and software modifications for all three varieties of VW and Audi 2.0-liter TDI models, according to Reuters.

Along with the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), CARB must approve any modifications before they are implemented by VW; the two agencies will jointly evaluate the changes.

The company now appears to be taking the matter more seriously than before, CARB chair Mary Nichols told Reuters in a recent interview.

The VW Group brought in a new team to work on the modifications that seems to have better access to "the decision makers in Germany," Nichols said.

In January, CARB rejected a previous VW proposal for modifications to the 2.0-liter TDI models, saying it lacked sufficient detail.

Nichols said the modifications CARB plans to test encompass all three "generations" of 2.0-liter VW and Audi cars, spanning model years 2009 to 2015.

The "first-generation" cars—approximately 325,000 vehicles—do not have selective catalytic reduction systems (SCR, also known as urea injection), presenting a particular challenge in meeting emissions standards.

Many analysts believe these cars will not be fitted with SCR systems, which would require considerable additional hardware and plumbing as well as a great deal of software change.

Subsequent "generations" of TDI models may require less-extensive modifications to achieve compliance.

Owners open to the modification option should probably wait to learn how the modifications will affect their cars' performance and fuel economy before making a final decision, however.

To pass muster, Volkswagen must show that it can reduce emissions from its non-compliant diesels to within 80 to 90 percent of emissions standards, according to Reuters.

Full compliance will not be required because VW has agreed to pay $2.7 billion over three years to reduce diesel pollution from other sources, CARB's Nichols said.

MORE: California Rejects VW Diesel Modification Plan: 'Gaps,' 'Lacks Detail'

She also said Volkswagen has made no real progress in devising modifications for the 85,000 VW, Audi, and Porsche models equipped with different 3.0-liter V-6 diesel engines.

These models were not included in the settlement that covers the 2.0-liter TDI models.

Buyback offers for the 2.0-liter Volkswagen and Audi diesel models won't go out until the settlement receives final approval, which will come only after a hearing scheduled for October 18.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Volkswagen diesel modifications begin testing in California. Can faulty cars be fixed?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0802/Volkswagen-diesel-modifications-begin-testing-in-California.-Can-faulty-cars-be-fixed
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe