Jobless claims fall sharply; August numbers revised

The job market got two good bits of news today: jobless claims dropped sharply last week, and August's disappointing jobs report was revised upward by 7,000 jobs added.  Both are signs that the job market is strengthening.

|
Alan Diaz/AP/File
Jessica Pimentel, of Hollywood, Fla., fills out a job application during a job fair in Sunrise. Fla.

The number of people applying for U.S. unemployment benefits dropped by a sharp 36,000 last week to a seasonally adjusted 280,000, a sign that the job market is strengthening.

The four-week average of applications, a less volatile measure, fell 4,750 to 299,500, the Labor Department said Thursday. The total number of people collecting benefits during the first week of September was 2.43 million, the fewest since May 2007.

Applications for unemployment benefits remain at pre-recession levels. The number of people seeking benefits has been trending downward for the past four months.

Over the past year, the four-week average for applications has fallen 7.1 percent. In 2009, during the Great Recession, they topped 650,000.

Applications are a proxy for layoffs. When fewer people seek benefits, it suggests that employers are keeping their workers, likely because they are more confident about customer demand and may be ready to hire.

The drop in the number of people applying for benefits has been coupled by steady job growth, despite a slowdown in hiring in August.

Employers added just 142,000 jobs last month, according to the Labor Department, down from 212,000 in July. That followed a six-month streak of monthly job gains in excess of 200,000. The unemployment rate fell to 6.1 percent from 6.2 percent, but only because some of those out of work gave up looking. The government doesn't count people as unemployed unless they are actively searching for a job.

The sharp drop in applications for unemployment benefits "should ease any fears that the weaker-than-expected payrolls data for August represented a change in the trend," said Jim O'Sullivan, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

Meanwhile, the unexpectedly weak jobs report for August wasn't as bleak as initially reported. An additional 7,000 jobs were added to the first revision, according to the Bureau of Labor statistics. 

"Each year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics updates its survey data with comprehensive tax records to obtain a more accurate measure of employment," Dean Maki, an economist with Barclays Research, writes via e-mailed analysis. "A preliminary estimate is released in September, and the final release comes with the January employment report. The preliminary estimate of the 2014 benchmark revision indicates an upward adjustment of 7k to nonfarm employment, or a bit under 1k jobs per month from April 2013 to March 2014 on average."

"We have found that annual benchmark revisions tend follow the business cycle, with upward revisions common during recoveries and downward revisions common during recessions. As the recovery has progressed, we would expect benchmark revisions to be more modest over time, " he adds. 

Still, increased hiring has yet to lift most Americans' paychecks. Wage growth has barely outpaced inflation since the recession ended more than five years ago.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Jobless claims fall sharply; August numbers revised
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0918/Jobless-claims-fall-sharply-August-numbers-revised
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe