Who's more productive: Switzerland or Wyoming?

Contrary to arguments that European social democracy is a success, a new ranking of US versus European states has American states ahead of fabled European powers.

|
Newscom/File
Welcome to the Alps! Or is it the Grand Tetons? Hint: This is a 2010 file photo taken from Signal Mountain – and it's a lot closer to Jackson Hole than Geneva. So who do you think is more productive when measured by purchasing power: the Swiss or Wyomingites?

While famed New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning Keynesian Paul Krugman has written, “Europe is an economic success, and that success shows that social democracy works,” University of Michigan economics professor Mark Perry argues quite a different story.

Based on recent data from the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), Perry has compared the per capita output of the 50 US states to European countries and found that as a group Europe — in terms of GDP adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) — has a $32,700 PPP GDP per capita, and could likely benefit from learning a little something from even humble Mississippi, the poorest US state, at $32,764. Perry also highlights how even mighty Germany falls at #47 according to his measures.

Here are the top 20 from Prof. Mark Perry’s Carpe Diem blog comparison:

Rank | State | 2010 GDP per Capita (PPP)
* District of Columbia, $168,327
* Luxembourg, $81,383
1 Alaska, $70,814
2 Delaware, $69,880
3 Wyoming, $68,162
4 Connecticut, $66,022
5 New York, $59,596
6 Massachusetts, $58,339
7 New Jersey, $55,715
8 Virginia, $53,113
9 Colorado, $52,205
* Norway, $52,013
10 California, $51,905
11 North Dakota, $51,882
12 Minnesota, $51,238
13 Maryland, $51,224
14 Washington, $50,912
15 Illinois, $50,581
16 South Dakota, $49,741
17 Texas, $49,119
18 Nebraska, $48,708
19 Hawaii, $48,697
20 Oregon, $48,590

Only two European countries — Luxembourg and Norway (the latter of which is neither part of the EU, nor does it use the euro) — even make the top 20. In fact, the list would need to extend all the way down to #31, Georgia, and #32, Utah, to find the next European nation, Switzerland, wedged in between. This is despite being the famed private banking center and, again, the non-EU, non-euro using nation that it is.

Of course, GDP adjusted by PPP does not take into consideration certain quality of life issues such as living standards, vacation time, healthcare, and a host of other factors… however, it’s interesting to note that at least by some measures, the US continues to come out ahead. You can check out the complete top-50 list in a Carpe Diem blog post on how Europe could get an economic lesson from Mississippi.

Add/view comments on this post.

--------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Who's more productive: Switzerland or Wyoming?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Daily-Reckoning/2011/0624/Who-s-more-productive-Switzerland-or-Wyoming
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe