Are you a renter or a keeper?

Financially, people can be divided into two categories: renters and keepers. Ownership requires going without some things for now, while the philosophy of indebtedness lets you sacrifice some of the future to have those things now. 

|
Rick Bowmer/AP/File
A house for rent and for sale sign sit in front of a home in Portland, Ore. According to Hamm, being a 'renter' involves making long-term sacrifices, while being a 'keeper' means making short-term ones.

A while back, I ran across this brilliant quote from Sam Lipsyte’s 2010 novel, The Ask:

She was from the people who kept everything. I was from the people who rented some of everything for brief amounts of time. I knew I deserved no pity, would get none from the people who kept everything. They only pitied the people with nothing at all.

Setting aside the political undertones of what he’s writing here, I thought the analogy of the financially secure “people who kept everything” and the financially unstable “people who rented some of everything for brief amounts of time” was an interesting comparison.

Think about this in terms of car ownership.

One person buys a late model used car, paying cash. They save a little each month for the next late model used car purchase, and when their current car stops working well, they replace it, buying a new late model used car, paying cash.

Another person also buys late model used cars, but they take out a loan for it, preferably the longest possible term loan so the monthly payments are as small as possible. By the time the loan is over with, there’s only a year or two before they’re looking to trade off that late model used car for another one, taking out a loan for it, preferably the longest possible term loan.

One person “who kept everything,” one person “who rented some of everything.”

You can do the same thing in terms of home ownership.

One person buys a very inexpensive home, paying the largest down payment possible. They pay off that home as quickly as possible while dumping time and effort into refurbishing that home. They continue to save, then in a few years, they sell their home and pay cash for the remainder of the cost of a much nicer home.

Another person rents an apartment for years, then makes a small down payment on a much nicer home, also picking up a thirty year mortgage in the process.

One person “who kept everything,” one person “who rented some of everything.”

Are you going to be a person “who kept everything” or a person who “rented some of everything”?

The philosophy of ownership versus the philosophy of indebtedness.

The catch, for most people, is that sticking to the philosophy of ownership requires going without some things for now, while the philosophy of indebtedness lets you sacrifice some of the future to have those things now. Over the long run, though, the philosophy of indebtedness drains you. It gives you a pile of monthly bills, restricting your career and personal choices. It ends up depleting your net worth.

The philosophy of ownership, on the other hand, means that interest works in your favor. It means fewer monthly bills and thus more career and personal freedom. It means you have much more control over buying and selling the things in your life, and it means that you have little worry of things being taken away from you if you can’t pay the bills.

The choice is up to you, and you make it with almost every financial transaction.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Are you a renter or a keeper?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Simple-Dollar/2013/0223/Are-you-a-renter-or-a-keeper
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe