‘Star Wars’ and race: It’s complicated, but improving

|
© 2022 Lucasfilm Ltd. & ™
Moses Ingram plays the villainous Jedi-hunter Reva in the new series “Obi-Wan Kenobi” on Disney+. After the show debuted at the end of May, Ms. Ingram received racist messages from a faction of “Star Wars” fans.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

The most recognizable voice from the “Star Wars” stories is that of a Black man, a legacy that proudly continues. And yet, when the face of that villain was revealed decades ago, we saw the face of a white man. 

The franchise based in a galaxy far, far away has a complicated history with race, especially when it comes to the forked comments from fans toward actors of color. When John Boyega appeared as Finn in the most recent revival trilogy, for example, some fans were angry.  

Why We Wrote This

Casting “Star Wars” stories for the screen can be fraught. Actors of color, in particular, often face scrutiny and backlash. But a speedy official response recently suggests an effort to help society move toward more tolerance.

That was seven years ago, and as the new “Star Wars” series, “Obi-Wan Kenobi,” premiered on Disney+ at the end of May, it looked like some things might never change when a racist faction of fans attacked Moses Ingram and her role as the villainous Reva.

This time, though, the universe spoke up, via the official Twitter account for “Star Wars”: “We are proud to welcome Moses Ingram to the Star Wars family and excited for Reva’s story to unfold. If anyone intends to make her feel in any way unwelcome, we have only one thing to say: we resist.”

In the face of this all-too-familiar scourge of the galaxy, it’s time to build something different. Not just characters, but character. 

The “Star Wars” franchise’s sometimes problematic history with race has always been unfortunate and ironic.

The most recognizable voice from the stories is that of a Black man, a legacy that proudly continues. And yet, when the face of that villain was revealed decades ago, we saw the face of a white man. Looking back on it today, James Earl Jones’ voice matched with Sebastian Shaw’s face felt like a twisted prequel of “Get Out,” the satirical horror film where Black people’s minds and bodies are suppressed and subverted by white people.

Walt Disney Studios had a chance to rectify this sordid space history in 2015 with “Star Wars: Episode VII – The Force Awakens.” John Boyega, an up-and-coming actor, starred as Finn and wowed casual fans with his fresh face and wit. We saw a glimpse of his potential and his joy as he viewed himself in the trailer for “The Force Awakens.” We saw the look in his eye as the preview progressed, and then he saw himself with a lightsaber. His reaction was palpable, the type of reaction a child might have when he sees the flash from a toy sword for the first time. It was a sign that things might change in the “Star Wars” universe.

Why We Wrote This

Casting “Star Wars” stories for the screen can be fraught. Actors of color, in particular, often face scrutiny and backlash. But a speedy official response recently suggests an effort to help society move toward more tolerance.

And then, just as quickly, the “dark side” appeared – specifically, the ugliness of fan backlash. Some were angry with the Jedi-to-be’s chemistry with Rey, played by Daisy Ridley, who is white; some were angry with his presence overall. 

That was seven years ago, and as the new “Star Wars” series, “Obi-Wan Kenobi,” premiered on Disney+ at the end of May, it looked like some things might never change when a racist faction of fans attacked Moses Ingram and her role as the villainous Reva.

This time, the universe spoke, via the official Instagram and Twitter accounts for “Star Wars”: “We are proud to welcome Moses Ingram to the Star Wars family and excited for Reva’s story to unfold. If anyone intends to make her feel in any way unwelcome, we have only one thing to say: we resist.”

Adding in a subsequent tweet, “There are more than 20 million sentient species in the Star Wars galaxy, don’t choose to be a racist.”

It was a deliberate and different commentary, even in an age where protest is perpetual. It goes without saying that Mr. Boyega’s circumstances, which he outlined in Britain’s incarnation of GQ, likely factored into Disney’s rebuke of fan hatred. (The recent online bullying of Kelly Marie Tran, an Asian actor, may also have played a role.)

“I’m the only cast member who had their own unique experience of that franchise based on their race,” Mr. Boyega told the publication. “It makes you angry with a process like that. It makes you much more militant; it changes you. Because you realise, ‘I got given this opportunity but I’m in an industry that wasn’t even ready for me.’ Nobody else in the cast had people saying they were going to boycott the movie because [they were in it]. Nobody else had the uproar and death threats sent to their Instagram DMs and social media, saying, ‘Black this and black that and you shouldn’t be a Stormtrooper.’ Nobody else had that experience.”

Certainly, there have been Black characters in the “Star Wars” canon – Mace Windu and Lando Calrissian come to mind. The concern for Black fans of the series is the second-fiddle roles that those characters have played. Windu, who was played by Samuel L. Jackson, was poised to thwart the Dark Side in “Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith” until Anakin Skywalker made his shocking heel turn. Calrissian, played by Billy Dee Williams in the earlier “Star Wars” films, and by Donald Glover in “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” had a reputation as a trickster, and even with his hero turn, still was a largely misinterpreted character.

The challenge for “Star Wars” moving forward is to continue in this path of character development and critical rebuke of racism. The conscientious words of key figures in the latest series are important. And yet, we understand that wide-scale change happens when corporations change. It is fitting that Ms. Ingram would speak about the racism she has endured with defiance, yet lament, “There’s nothing anybody can do about this. There’s nothing anybody can do to stop this hate. ... But I think the thing that bothers me is ... this feeling that I’ve had inside of myself – which no one has told me – but this feeling that I’ve just got to shut up and take it. That I’ve just got to grin and bear it. And I’m not built like that.”

It shouldn’t be her problem to bear at all, much less alone. It’s the universe’s problem. Silence is consent, and in the vacuum of space, that silence has been deafening. There is something we can do about this. The quick and supportive official response to the hate, and more importantly, Mr. Boyega’s commentary, are good starting points.

In the face of this all-too-familiar scourge of the galaxy, it’s time to build something different. Not just characters, but character.

Ken Makin is the host of the “Makin’ A Difference” podcast.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘Star Wars’ and race: It’s complicated, but improving
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/2022/0610/Star-Wars-and-race-It-s-complicated-but-improving
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe