Online discussion forums: Should websites make readers use real names?

An interesting piece in the Boston Globe Sunday Magazine examines the cost of allowing anonymous postings on Internet discussion forums. "After years of letting anonymity rule online," the article states, "many media heavyweights, from The Washington Post to The Huffington Post, have begun to modify their policies. The goal is to take the playground back from anonymous bullies and give greater weight to those willing to offer, in addition to strong views, their real names."

What do you think? Should more websites – from travel review sites to blogs – insist on real names, or is anonymity an important part of the Web's open format that's worth preserving?

Share your comments using the form below.

You've read 3 of 3 free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Online discussion forums: Should websites make readers use real names?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Editorial-Board-Blog/2010/0628/Online-discussion-forums-Should-websites-make-readers-use-real-names
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
CSM logo

Why is Christian Science in our name?

Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.

The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.

Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.

Explore values journalism About us