Should we care what cows think? How readers broadened my view of animals.

Good journalism opens minds and invites readers to see things differently. Sometimes, readers can have a similar effect on journalists.

|
Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
Staff writer Stephanie Hanes “interviews” Pietro the steer while on assignment at Farm Sanctuary in Watkins Glen, New York, June 10.

In the tense final days of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, I was spending much of my professional life thinking about a cow.

This may seem odd, even for a writer focused on the environment. After all, there was no shortage of breaking news about the climate, not to mention other big news subjects.

But that cow was haunting me.

Staff photographer Melanie Stetson Freeman had photographed her in a sophisticated methane-measuring chamber, as part of a story about the scientific quest for “climate-friendly” milk. The structure wasn’t tiny – far larger, in fact, than what cows in most dairy barns experience – but it sparked reader questions.

We reassured them that Cornell University, home of the study, adhered to animal welfare regulations. But there was one query I couldn’t shake. Did I think, this reader asked, that the cow liked being in that metal-and-glass contraption?

It made me wonder: Do I know what cows like, let alone think? Does anyone? And, given the human problems in the world, should we care?

Later on that same reporting trip, Melanie and I visited Farm Sanctuary in Watkins Glen, New York. There, a huge steer named Greg pranced up to us, two-stepping in a way that dog owners would recognize as a clear “play with me” motion. “He’s super friendly,” said Gene Baur, the sanctuary’s founder, who went on to explain how research shows that bovines form family groups, recognize human faces, and demonstrate emotions like joy and sadness.

This prompted me to learn what else researchers have discovered about other animal species. It turns out, as I write in the cover story featured in the Nov. 18 issue of the Monitor Weekly, that a growing body of scientific research paints an increasingly complex, emotional, and sensory-rich portrait of the world, with animals from goats to octopuses to bumblebees exhibiting different forms of what’s often called consciousness.

This brings up big ethical questions, as well as a challenge: Can we live harmoniously and kindly in a world of other beings who have different experiences from ours, but who also share deep commonalities?

It is a question, of course, that goes well beyond my cow.

Perhaps, at a time of political division and misunderstanding, the inner lives of animals offer clues for how we can live a bit more gently, understand differences better, and see ourselves not as separate and superior but as part of one, sparkling tapestry.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Should we care what cows think? How readers broadened my view of animals.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2024/1124/animal-consciousness-political-division
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe